Originally posted by Gatekeeper
The last time I checked, the objective of the 1990-91 Gulf War was the liberation of Kuwait, not the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation of Baghdad and removal of Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps it's easy to "forget" that little aspect now, nearly 12 years later, or dismiss it anyway, but I really don't think our Arab allies at the time would've been pleased had we gone beyond the objectives. In fact, it's my understanding that it was behind-the-scenes pressure, in addition to the limits of the UN mandate, that led to coalition forces coming to a halt in southern Iraq.
Not that "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf was pleased. From what I've heard, he told Bush Sr., et al., that he was only 30 to 40 minutes away from Baghdad. I believe he also stated something about cutting the head off the snake ... and that's something that didn't happen in 1991.
We stopped short, and ever since a number of folks have been conveniently forgetting or dismissing *why* we stopped short.
Gatekeeper
The last time I checked, the objective of the 1990-91 Gulf War was the liberation of Kuwait, not the invasion of Iraq and subsequent occupation of Baghdad and removal of Saddam Hussein.
Perhaps it's easy to "forget" that little aspect now, nearly 12 years later, or dismiss it anyway, but I really don't think our Arab allies at the time would've been pleased had we gone beyond the objectives. In fact, it's my understanding that it was behind-the-scenes pressure, in addition to the limits of the UN mandate, that led to coalition forces coming to a halt in southern Iraq.
Not that "Stormin" Norman Schwartzkopf was pleased. From what I've heard, he told Bush Sr., et al., that he was only 30 to 40 minutes away from Baghdad. I believe he also stated something about cutting the head off the snake ... and that's something that didn't happen in 1991.
We stopped short, and ever since a number of folks have been conveniently forgetting or dismissing *why* we stopped short.
Gatekeeper
It was a mistake.
Comment