Originally posted by Shadowstrike
The difference is that same-sex relationships produce offspring, which is the point of reproduction. I hold that people should try to raise the child, put it up for adoption, or don't have it in the first place. While this may be idealism, our society should try to eliminate the 'need' for abortions with more active programs that encourage kids towards academics, sports or even hobbies, and away from drugs and sex.
The difference is that same-sex relationships produce offspring, which is the point of reproduction. I hold that people should try to raise the child, put it up for adoption, or don't have it in the first place. While this may be idealism, our society should try to eliminate the 'need' for abortions with more active programs that encourage kids towards academics, sports or even hobbies, and away from drugs and sex.
Why is this a bad thing? And surely you don't remotely think all heterosexual couplings are about reproduction? What about just being together with someone you love and care for, regardless of the gender involved? Your logic invalidates any heterosexual relationship where children aren't had. Should people only be allowed to have sex for procreation?
Comment