Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arafat Calls for Democratic Elections in the United States

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Well there are only 5 conservative justices.
    "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
    -Joan Robinson

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Saint Marcus Do you even have to ask?

      That hurts me deeply.
      haven't posted here much, I thought I could get away with that one. Of course I know you are.
      Hoya Saxa

      Comment


      • #18
        you better



        Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

        Comment


        • #19
          Does this sound familiar:
          * The self-declared winner is the son of the former prime minister and that former prime minister was himself the former head of that nation’s secret police (CIA).
          * The self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some 200-year-old colonial holdover from the nation’s pre-democracy past.
          * The self-declared winner's 'victory' is based solely on disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother!
          * At least 100,000 votes in this disputed province were thrown into the trash as void.
          * Maybe intentionally confusing, poorly drafted ballot of one district, a district heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of voters to vote for the wrong candidate or make a mistakes that would cause their vote to be thrown out.
          * Members of that nation's most despised caste, fearing for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to vote in near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner's candidacy.
          * Hundreds of members of that most-despised caste were intercepted on their way to the polls by provincial police operating under the authority of the self-declared winner's brother .
          * The self-declared winner and his political party opposed a more careful by- hand inspection and recounting of the ballots in the disputed province or in its most hotly disputed district.
          "In some of its more lunatic aspects, political correctness is merely ridiculous. But in the thinking behind it, there is something more sinister which is shown by the fact that already there are certain areas and topics where freedom of speech, in the sense of the right to open and frank discussion, is being gradually but significantly eroded." -- Judge Neil Denison

          Comment


          • #20
            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
            -Bokonon

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Saint Marcus and with that you answered your own question.

              That is what's wrong with the US elections...
              you only b**** about it because you don't like the outcome...
              Hoya Saxa

              Comment


              • #22
                you only b**** about it because you don't like the outcome...
                -True, but that doesn't make the complaints any less legitimate. I don't ***** about the refereeing in the Spain- S. Korea game, but that doesn't mean I have to believe Spanish fans have nothing to complain about.
                "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                -Joan Robinson

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Ignorance
                  Does this sound familiar:
                  * The self-declared winner is the son of the former prime minister and that former prime minister was himself the former head of that nation’s secret police (CIA).
                  * The self-declared winner lost the popular vote but won based on some 200-year-old colonial holdover from the nation’s pre-democracy past.
                  * The self-declared winner's 'victory' is based solely on disputed votes cast in a province governed by his brother!
                  * At least 100,000 votes in this disputed province were thrown into the trash as void.
                  * Maybe intentionally confusing, poorly drafted ballot of one district, a district heavily favoring the self-declared winner's opponent, led thousands of voters to vote for the wrong candidate or make a mistakes that would cause their vote to be thrown out.
                  * Members of that nation's most despised caste, fearing for their lives/livelihoods, turned out in record numbers to vote in near-universal opposition to the self-declared winner's candidacy.
                  * Hundreds of members of that most-despised caste were intercepted on their way to the polls by provincial police operating under the authority of the self-declared winner's brother .
                  * The self-declared winner and his political party opposed a more careful by- hand inspection and recounting of the ballots in the disputed province or in its most hotly disputed district.
                  Trash, contemptible trash. You know that's a load of tripe. That or perhaps you're a commie.
                  Hoya Saxa

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Victor Galis -True, but that doesn't make the complaints any less legitimate.
                    If you only complain about something because you don't like the outcome it sure as hell makes the complaint less legitimate.
                    Hoya Saxa

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      If you only complain about something because you don't like the outcome it sure as hell makes the complaint less legitimate.
                      -Nonsense. If you like the outcome of something, you must be stupid or have very strong principles to complain about the way it happened.
                      "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                      -Joan Robinson

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by NY Hoya
                        Trash, contemptible trash. You know that's a load of tripe. That or perhaps you're a commie.
                        Oh yeah. The old "He is criticizing our goverment, he must therefore be a commie!" -routine.

                        But no. I actually like when the candidates who get the more votes than others win.
                        "In some of its more lunatic aspects, political correctness is merely ridiculous. But in the thinking behind it, there is something more sinister which is shown by the fact that already there are certain areas and topics where freedom of speech, in the sense of the right to open and frank discussion, is being gradually but significantly eroded." -- Judge Neil Denison

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          That or perhaps you're a commie
                          what century do you live in?

                          If you only complain about something because you don't like the outcome it sure as hell makes the complaint less legitimate.
                          And what is your opinion of the electoral system?

                          Isn't it so....1800s?
                          Quod Me Nutrit Me Destruit

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Yes, that sort of thing does have a certain appeal to it.
                            "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                            -Joan Robinson

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Victor Galis -Nonsense. If you like the outcome of something, you must be stupid or have very strong principles to complain about the way it happened.
                              I think you missed the point. If the only reason one complains about an outcome is because they don't like said outcome, it is suspect.
                              Hoya Saxa

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                If the only reason one complains about an outcome is because they don't like said outcome, it is suspect.
                                -Oh... I've been complaining about the electoral college since before this election. This only fed me a good example of what was wrong with it.
                                "The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists."
                                -Joan Robinson

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X