Mohammed in Hell

[Ethelred]

Anyone who can understand Italain politics is much to devious to be trustable.

I don't know about the present case but back when the city states were squabling and Maciavelli wrote the The Prince someone understood the politics well enough. The French came in and conquered a lot of it because the Italians were too busy being devious to actually do anything constructive about stopping them.

[Gatekeeper]

Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
No, art shouldn't be subsidised at all .

Only when corporations get weaned off Mama Government's teat.

Gatekeeper

[Adalbertus]

Mohammed being in heaven and seing that non-Muslims are there as well would be enough of a hell for him

Today's muslims declare so many people in hell that IMO they don't have the right to complain about a centuries old picture in a non-Muslim country which even does not reflect the general attitude nowadays. Redeclare the person to be OBL

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Adalbertus
Mohammed being in heaven and seing that non-Muslims are there as well would be enough of a hell for him

Today's muslims declare so many people in hell that IMO they don't have the right to complain about a centuries old picture in a non-Muslim country which even does not reflect the general attitude nowadays. Redeclare the person to be OBL

I agree completely. Quit whining and get to work trying to live up to the 'peaceful religion' crap that I've heard so much about and seen so little of. Honestly, how many of Islam's problems are going to be solved by actions taken in non-Islamic countries?

[Alexander's Horse]

A bit offensive to have it in a church. Museum? No problem.

[ZoboZeWarrior]

I'm 50% for and 50% against.

I'm against lobby groups ... And this painting is an ancient artwork and have to be respect as it.

Since it is a violant point of view : sending the muslim Prophet into the Eternal Flame of the Hell. And I considere that, even muslim are wrong for christians point of view, christians shall not decide who should go to hell and who should go to Paradise, only their God could do it.

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Originally posted by Ned
Regardless, Mohammed did marry a 9-year old girl and waged aggressive war to spread the faith.

She was the daughter of one of his relative or friend, and she was orphan. Political interest was one of the reasons.

I don't think he "consummed" before she had a (at this time) acceptable age for that. And I haven't read in the Koran that he f*cked her at nine.

[Ned]

Zobo, Well I don't know the truth here. There seems to be more than one story floating around. How does one separate the wheat from the chaff?

BTW, there is a Gnostic gospel that suggests that Jesus' relationship with Mary Magdalene was far from Platonic. Who can tell from this distance?

[Az]

ZoboZeWarrior : reminds me of some catholic priests , actually.

they all suck. banana.

[Kropotkin]

" I did not have sex with that woman, miss M. Magdalene"

[August Borms]

I wonder which one is Mohammed

[Hydey]

Its about religion so I don't give a frig

[Sava]

If there is a hell, Mohammed is in it. Keep the painting!

[problem_child]

I say keep it where it is, this is what religion is all about- if the catholics removed the pic they may as well stop being catholic all together, and if muslims did'nt blow up buddist statues, they too may as well stop being muslim.

You may as well suggest the KKK become more inclusive and accept black, jews and catholics into their movement, or suggest that the World Wide Masogynic Movement Against Women elect a female president.

All this revisionist bull annoys me- like it clearly states in the bible that homosexualityis wrong in the eyes of god- yet you get christians trying to pretend theirs is not a homophobic outfit and they really don't think gay people should be flogged after all

sh*t should stink.

[Az]

"Mommy, why does daddy enter the big bear's tushie?"

seriously, which one is Mohammad?