Seeing as the title of the thread we were discussing rugby in is irrelevant, Im starting a new one.
Leading up to the Tri-nations tournament it seems that Australia have slightly tougher matches to play than NZ or SA.
Australia play the NZ maori, and France twice.
New Zealand play Italy, and have two matches against Ireland.
South Africa play Wales twice, Argentina once, and one match against the Pacific Warriors.
Will this be an advantage for Australia, or do they need more time to get themselves sorted before taking on tough opponents? I think it may turn out to be an advantage as they will be used to playing at a higher level by the time the tri-nations starts. If they do badly though it could sap their confidence somewhat.
South Africa could do with a few easier opponents at this stage I reckon, what with having a new coach and several new players. For them its a godsend.
Leading up to the Tri-nations tournament it seems that Australia have slightly tougher matches to play than NZ or SA.
Australia play the NZ maori, and France twice.
New Zealand play Italy, and have two matches against Ireland.
South Africa play Wales twice, Argentina once, and one match against the Pacific Warriors.
Will this be an advantage for Australia, or do they need more time to get themselves sorted before taking on tough opponents? I think it may turn out to be an advantage as they will be used to playing at a higher level by the time the tri-nations starts. If they do badly though it could sap their confidence somewhat.
South Africa could do with a few easier opponents at this stage I reckon, what with having a new coach and several new players. For them its a godsend.
Comment