Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Homosexual Couples Shouldn't Have Children (or, Only In America)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 8
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 template Next
  • #91
    Originally posted by lightblue
    Both the women are deaf, right? And the "father" was a friend of the family..., not some random deaf person. In what way is this worse than a caucasian woman going to a sperm bank and requesting sperm from a caucasian man?
    You think being caucasian is the same as being deaf?
    ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
    ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

    Comment

    • #92
      Damn, Caligasta!

      PC has sure gone a little too far .
      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

      Comment

      • #93
        Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
        Damn, Caligasta!

        PC has sure gone a little too far .
        ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
        ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

        Comment

        • #94
          Originally posted by Caligastia

          I dont think these women should be imprisoned, but I do think they should be sterilzed and have the child taken away.
          If you think that's the humane option, you have a very strange set of standards.
          The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

          Comment

          • #95
            No responses from my last post.

            So everyone agrees with my last post, then?
            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

            Comment

            • #96
              I dont think these women should be imprisoned, but I do think they should be sterilzed and have the child taken away.
              I actually agree; they should also be forcibly sterilised - child-abusers shouldn't be allowed to have children.
              www.my-piano.blogspot

              Comment

              • #97
                Originally posted by MrFun
                No responses from my last post.

                So everyone agrees with my last post, then?
                No, were all trying to ignore you...
                ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                Comment

                • #98
                  Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny
                  If you think that's the humane option, you have a very strange set of standards.
                  I consider anyone who intentionally has a disabled child to be a child-abuser, as boddies said. As far as I am concerned if they cant make responsible decisions regarding their own reproduction they deserve to be sterilized.
                  ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                  ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                  Comment

                  • #99
                    Originally posted by MrFun


                    It is not a crime if you conceive a child without planning to do so with deliberation.

                    While I would not nessarily classify it as a crime to deliberately conceive a child with a disability, it is still done in extreme poor taste, and those to-be parents might have their thoughts skewed in some way.

                    Now adopting a disabled child is a completely different matter. When one adopts a disabled child, they are doing a very good thing, in that they are planning to care for a child very few people would likely want to adopt.
                    Just in case some people missed my last post.
                    A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                    Comment

                    • #100
                      Yeah well if this was a fertile man and woman instead of two fertile women they wouldn't have to make this choice.
                      www.my-piano.blogspot

                      Comment

                      • #101
                        Originally posted by Boddington's
                        Yeah well if this was a fertile man and woman instead of two fertile women they wouldn't have to make this choice.
                        What the hell does that mean, Spinky?
                        "My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
                        "The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud

                        Comment

                        • #102
                          [guessing mode] That if they where of opposite sexes they would get a deaf child anyhow and everyone would think it was OK [/guessing mode]

                          Comment

                          • #103
                            Originally posted by MrFun


                            Just in case some people missed my last post.
                            The universe doesnt revolve around you, you know...
                            ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                            ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                            Comment

                            • #104
                              Originally posted by Kropotkin
                              [guessing mode] That if they where of opposite sexes they would get a deaf child anyhow and everyone would think it was OK [/guessing mode]

                              But its not intentional. They dont have a choice of sperm donors.
                              ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                              ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                              Comment

                              • #105
                                Originally posted by Kropotkin
                                [guessing mode] That if they where of opposite sexes they would get a deaf child anyhow and everyone would think it was OK [/guessing mode]

                                It would be OK because it wouldn't be their choice, they didn't pick their genes after all. These monsters picked a disabled baby.

                                By the way, deafness and other disabilities should be eliminated from the genepool. Is there anyone here who can seriously tell me they think there is a reason for them to stay?

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 template Next
                                Working...
                                X