Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The weak and stupid survive

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    They sure do and they keep making stupid threads like this one

    The reason we don't determine who should be in the gene pool is that for the most part these kind of schemes have been more based on racism rather than improving the gene pool. The Nazis, white suppremacists and whatever fringe group believe themselves to be superior are all subscribers to this theory.

    We also don't know what kind of kind of genes so called inferior people have. If we only let people who don't have a chance of having a mental retarded kid procreate we could be losing a vital gene that might allow us to ward off some virus or adapt so some change in the enviroment. Genetics has not advanced so much that we know what each gene does. That;s the reason we procreate so that maybe some mutation may save the species from an unknown disaster.
    When one is someone, why should one want to be something?
    ~Gustave Flaubert

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui


      I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic
      I know
      ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
      ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ThePantaloonDog
        We also don't know what kind of kind of genes so called inferior people have.
        Eventually we will, and we will be able to select what we want and eliminate what we dont want.
        ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
        ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

        Comment


        • #19
          Can we list names now?
          "The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
          Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Caligastia
            NO! I am talking about how we will be able to manipulate the human genome to our advantage when the tech gets advanced enough.
            Eugenics is only used by nazis and other people who should be designated as hate criminals should they ever manage to pull anything off.

            It's a fine line between wiping out all the handicapped people (even if it's by manipulating their genomes) and wiping out people with other "undesirable" traits. You start talking about people being intrinsically better or worse than others.
            I refute it thus!
            "Destiny! Destiny! No escaping that for me!"

            Comment


            • #21
              Well, the "logical" thing to do for a start is to discourage (or prevent, even?) those likely to pass on obvious genetic disadvantages (initial thinking - Huntington's, Cystic Fibrosis) from procreating. This is extremely thin ice however... I mean, where do you stop? Thick people? People with red hair? "Can of worms", anyone?

              DISCLAIMER: I'm not advocating this. So don't even say it.
              Visit the Vote UK Discussion Forum!

              Comment


              • #22
                Eugenics is only used by nazis and other people who should be designated as hate criminals should they ever manage to pull anything off.


                Who said eugenics? He said use technology to eliminate handicaps and diseases in the genome. The so-called 'designer babies'. Not a bad idea at all.
                “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Goingonit


                  Eugenics is only used by nazis and other people who should be designated as hate criminals should they ever manage to pull anything off.
                  Thats not true actually. The US and many european counries had eugenics programs going long before hitler came to power. If it wasnt for Hitlers abuse of eugenics it would probably still be in practice today.
                  Originally posted by Goingonit

                  It's a fine line between wiping out all the handicapped people (even if it's by manipulating their genomes) and wiping out people with other "undesirable" traits. You start talking about people being intrinsically better or worse than others.
                  The fact is that some people are intrinsically better or worse than others. Just as in the plant and animal kingdom, because after all, we are just glorified monkeys.
                  ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                  ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Hey Caligastia. If the weak and stupid didn't survive, what chance would you have? Do you have a death wish?
                    Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

                    Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
                      Well, the "logical" thing to do for a start is to discourage (or prevent, even?) those likely to pass on obvious genetic disadvantages (initial thinking - Huntington's, Cystic Fibrosis) from procreating. This is extremely thin ice however... I mean, where do you stop? Thick people? People with red hair? "Can of worms", anyone?
                      That would be logical, but its not politically feasable at this point.
                      ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                      ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
                        Hey Caligastia. If the weak and stupid didn't survive, what chance would you have? Do you have a death wish?
                        Well you wouldnt be around if all the criminals had been exterminated instead of being sent to that big southern desert you call home...
                        ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                        ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Free condoms, Free birth control pills, Free sterilization.
                          Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
                          Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
                          "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
                          From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            That would be logical, but its not politically feasable at this point.
                            Hence "logical"...
                            Visit the Vote UK Discussion Forum!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by *End Is Forever*


                              Hence "logical"...
                              ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                              ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
                                Free condoms, Free birth control pills, Free sterilization.
                                That would be a good start.
                                ...people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
                                ...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X