The weak and stupid survive

[Sikander]

Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
Free condoms, Free birth control pills, Free sterilization.

Unfortunately the wrong people would go for this. You would have to put up a big sign saying "Free T-Shirt", and then sterilize the people that went there.

[Goingonit]

Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Did it ever occur to any of you that natural selection is already doing its job? Human beings get their edge from their brains. A human alone and without training doesn't have much pf an edge over other animals. Gather a whole bunch of these brains together and voila, you get a culture. Humans living within a culture clearly have a huge advantage over other species. Among humans natural selection should logically favor those who can thrive in a group setting.

Yet stupid loners manage to get mates.
The thing about natural selection for humans is that the traits encouraged would be bodily and thus humans would get sexier and stupider as time went on.

[ZoboZeWarrior]

Animals continue to evolve. The evolution was only genetic.
Now "Intelligent animal" have a 'Lamark' evolution.

Our genetic pool still evolve slowly (causing most of time genetic
illness).
Then animals evolved by learning and teaching (parents teach how to survive to their childrens).
Now humans study how to evolve.

The way how the life evolve, evolve itself !

Amazing, isn't it ?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Look at it this way. If you could go back in time, would you....

A- Persuade Prof. Steven Hawking's parents not to reproduce for the good of the gene pool and the benefit of future generations?


....or....


B- Chloroform Caligastia's father and cut his nuts off?

[Lefty Scaevola]

Edit: Over the top there. sorry.

[Caligastia]

This thread is going to the dogs.

[MichaeltheGreat]

Originally posted by Bugs ****ing Bunny
Look at it this way. If you could go back in time, would you....

A- Persuade Prof. Steven Hawking's parents not to reproduce for the good of the gene pool and the benefit of future generations?


....or....


B- Chloroform Caligastia's father and cut his nuts off?

Sorry Bugs, you're (with extremely rare exceptions, this being one) one of my favorite posters here, but that type of family-member comment is unacceptable, and it's a zero-tolerance policy.

One week. Check your PMs.

[ThePantaloonDog]

Nevermind this thread has gone downhill...

[Lefty Scaevola]

Re: The weak and stupid survive

Look on the bright side, Caligasta, the strong and the smart will have a target rich environment for exploitation.

[lightblue]

I think having kids should not be an untouchable right, but rather dependable on the potential parents worth to society .

OK, maybe not. The way i see it, some people might now be described as stupid/lazy/weak, but if the education system wouldn't have let them down or they wouldn't have grown up in a deprived area or their parents hadn't abused them, they might have grown up to be Nobel Prize winning scientists.

I think that the environment has a much larger role on the development of a person's personality and intelligence than the genes (eventhough they obviously play some role).

Hope this might bring the discussion back on tracks a bit .

[Urban Ranger]

Re: Re: The weak and stupid survive

Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
Look on the bright side, Caligasta, the strong and the smart will have a target rich environment for exploitation.

Unfortunately, the dumb and the weak who band together wil do in any strong and smart individuals.

[Dominikos]

Hello.

[chequita guevara]

Re: Why do the weak and stupid survive?

Originally posted by faded glory
Blame the liberals for destroying the gene-pool. Otherwise there would be nobody to vote for them.

Actually, stupid people overwhelmingly vote Republican. . . . or not at all. As Galbraith said, not all conservatives are stupid, but most stupid people are conservative.

[Caligastia]

Originally posted by Dominikos
Hello.

Hi

[Dr Strangelove]

Originally posted by faded glory
umm...ya but the moron's and lazy people are creating more offspring then the rest of us.

If you're referring to the Chinese and Indians, their problem is that they're poor, not stupid. When relocated to a country with resources to spare, i.e., the U.S.A., they do very well indeed. I 've wondered whether their edge isn't that centuries of living in more crowded conditions has selected for people who are more suited to urban living. If you're referring to the US I don't think it's true that stupid and/or lazy people are reproducing faster. I think that for every welfare family of six you find you'll find cases of individuals of similar condition who didn't breed at all because of various problems.