Somthing for evolutionist's to ponder

[faded glory]

Well......I just heard the most damning evidence against evolution ever.

Mathematicians have set it is impossible that man could have walked the earth for 3 million years. According to them.if this was the case..the population should be roughly around 500,000 per SQUARE mile ...putting the total population on earth well above 5 trillion instead of billion.....

Darwin whores, Explain yourselves here

[David Floyd]

I'm sure the explanation will involve something like natural factors mitigating against population increases, as well as lack of agricultural technology, high infant mortality, low life expectancy, etc.

Not that I agree with evolution, I'm just guessing their arguments

[Asher]

faded glory, ask them this:

Which is more likely: Evolution, or someone snapping his fingers and creating us out of prehistoric playdough.

And yes, I think they were assuming that there's no deaths before age 75 or something.

[faded glory]

Originally posted by David Floyd
I'm sure the explanation will involve something like natural factors mitigating against population increases, as well as lack of agricultural technology, high infant mortality, low life expectancy, etc.

Not that I agree with evolution, I'm just guessing their arguments

all these factors were taken into account.....war...famine..disease...old age...

it doesnt add up (as usaul)


I dont believe in Evolution or Creation. I think theres a third choice out there still.....well find it

[Asher]

Originally posted by faded glory
I dont believe in Evolution or Creation. I think theres a third choice out there still.....well find it

Yes, let's put more funding into SETI.

[Asher]

Originally posted by faded glory
all these factors were taken into account.....war...famine..disease...old age...

it doesnt add up (as usaul)

And sorry, that's bull****.

There's no way that's possible. How are they to know what kind of famines or diseases occured millions of years ago?

It's religious propaganda, take it for what it is.

Plus, by simple logic: if you crowd people that closely, they become berserk and kill each other until only a few are left.

[faded glory]

Well look how much the population grew in the last 2,000 years. You make up your own mind........ (afraid what you might conclude?)

[Kyle]

Wasn't there a cataclysmic event that wiped out most of humanity, which explains the low genetic variation between modern humans?


I was watching someone on Discovery or PBS, something like that was mentioned.

[faded glory]

Originally posted by Kyle
Wasn't there a cataclysmic event that wiped out most of humanity, which explains the low genetic variation between modern humans?


I was watching someone on Discovery or PBS, something like that was mentioned.

[sarcasm]

You mean the great flood 13,000 years ago?

[sarcasm/]

[Asher]

Originally posted by faded glory
Well look how much the population grew in the last 2,000 years. You make up your own mind........ (afraid what you might conclude?)

And look at how far technology has come, life expectancy, etc.

The effects of Darwinism are actually nonexistant now for humans. The government protects the humans who should be killed off by nature, so we've got tons of weak people reproducing exponentially and whatnot.

faded glory, it's obvious that you've been pretty much brainwashed with this whole thing, so maybe you should make up your own mind.

[Dr Spin]

Silly wabbit.

Mathematicians have set it is impossible that man could have walked the earth for 3 million years.

He hasn't. Man has only been aroud 200 000yrs or so. Circa 3 MYA we were barely looking at H.Habilus.

Show me the math, and I'll analyze specifics. I know a thing or two about it.

[Asher]

The math is out there with the logic which is in his source which is not named.

[Victor Galis]

"all these factors were taken into account... war... famine... disease... old age..."

-Then the model they used is no good. Because any model should take into account overcrowding. That increases the death rate until it exceeds the birth rate, leading to a cap on population.

[faded glory]

Originally posted by Asher

And look at how far technology has come, life expectancy, etc.

The effects of Darwinism are actually nonexistant now for humans. The government protects the humans who should be killed off by nature, so we've got tons of weak people reproducing exponentially and whatnot.

thats a load of crap.

If humans lived for 3 million years there would have been a little over a trillion of us around 0 ad. Think about it man.....

[faded glory]

Originally posted by Victor Galis
"all these factors were taken into account... war... famine... disease... old age..."

-Then the model they used is no good. Because any model should take into account overcrowding. That increases the death rate until it exceeds the birth rate, leading to a cap on population.

But wait!!!!! There is seemingly no proof of us ever being overcrowded


See how big these holes are that im poking?