Announcement

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 01:47

Originally posted by Asher
No, the problem here is you Religious whores need to dig yourself out of your hole and look around.
Us Darwinist whores are smart enough to figure it out without having our hands held the whole way like you seem to need.

No.....incorrect. I approach this subject with an open mind of debate. You are indoctrinated and would refuse to believe even if I give you evidence to the contrary.

Er...you think they had farming technology and whatnot many thousands of years ago?

They still only used a small percentage of what they COULD of used! And 3 million years? think about what your saying man! Mathatematicians dont lie..... (especially the swiss ones on TV)

**Oldenbarnevelt** · November 28, 2001, 01:49

Re: Somthing for evolutionist's to ponder

Originally posted by faded glory
Well......I just heard the most damning evidence against evolution ever.

Mathematicians have set it is impossible that man could have walked the earth for 3 million years.

You can't prove this with mathematics only. Mathematics doesn't say or prove anything about our world. You could use mathematics to support (or refute) biological hypotheses, but that would still be biology, not mathematics. Mathematicians are not qualified to make the statement that you quote, because they lack the biological background that is needed to make it.

It's out-bloody-rageous nonsense, or bad trolling.

**Asher** · November 28, 2001, 01:49

Originally posted by faded glory
No.....incorrect. I approach this subject with an open mind of debate. You are indoctrinated and would refuse to believe even if I give you evidence to the contrary.

The problem is there is nothing to believe in here.
You have no evidence, no links, no sources, your numbers are WRONG to start with.

It's like me saying mathematically it's impossible to have a God because 0 * 1 is not 1. Then I could go on a stupid rant like you just did.

They still only used a small percentage of what they COULD of used! And 3 million years? think about what your saying man! Mathatematicians dont lie..... (especially the swiss ones on TV)

You're right, he knows Math.
Therefore he can disprove a theory like Darwinism.

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 01:51

Originally posted by Asher

LOL!
You're COMPLETELY right, we ALWAYS had ample food for everyone.

lol....

I sense that you may be in complete denial.....

We are not 3 not million years old. The people who did this the local ABC station took all your wishy-wash variables into account. And that was answer. 500,000 per square mile.

So Darwin proves to be an old fool who just made up as he went along

**Imran Siddiqui** · November 28, 2001, 01:53

Troll, troll, troll!!

Darwin never formulated the idea of evolution... but natural selection, which evolution came from.

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 01:54

Originally posted by Asher
You're right, he knows Math.
Therefore he can disprove a theory like Darwinism.

Yes......I just told you humans could not have been on earth for 3 million years. The present day population would NOT reflect what it should be!

Yet you are continually bombarding me with that same line I quoted...

**Asher** · November 28, 2001, 01:54

Originally posted by faded glory
I sense that you may be in complete denial.....

We are not 3 not million years old. The people who did this the local ABC station took all your wishy-wash variables into account. And that was answer. 500,000 per square mile.

So Darwin proves to be an old fool who just made up as he went along

Look at what you're saying! Christ man, it's not me who's in denial.

The ABC station just disproved Darwinism, a theory that's been supported for AGES by science (That includes the realm of Mathematics).

Then you say I'm in denial because I don't believe their bull****?
They're obviously doing something wrong with the input variables, plus they have no way of knowing about major slaughters or deaths due to famine, disease, etc. It's entirely pulled out of their ass, probably for ratings boosts in a very religious area.

Then you come here, try to state that as hardcore evidence that Darwinism is wrong, without providing us with the formulas or input variables used, then you're SURPRISED when it's thoroughly rejected and you're ridiculed?

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 01:56

Dude even if the slightest mistake is made......the margin for error still is in favor of my arguement.

**devilmunchkin** · November 28, 2001, 01:57

no, our specific species isn't 3 million years old. that's a given. but our ancestoral species are.

**Asher** · November 28, 2001, 01:58

Originally posted by faded glory
Dude even if the slightest mistake is made......the margin for error still is in favor of my arguement.

You really do believe that, don't you?

But then again, people like Hitler could never have existed before the modern era.

There have never been MASSIVE disease outbreaks in the eras before medicine.

It's all very exponential and easy to calculate, isn't it?

Basic math operation, right?

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 02:00

Just all you sideliners out there. this is NOT a debate about god/creation..... this is more simply about trying to get an explanation about somthing I heard on local news.

(no bibles please

)

Ya Ashur my UFO theory is lookin pretty good now

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 02:01

Originally posted by Asher
It's all very exponential and easy to calculate, isn't it?

Basic math operation, right?

Your still a few hundred Billion off!

**Asher** · November 28, 2001, 02:03

Originally posted by faded glory
Your still a few hundred Billion off!

Fraid not.

What if half of the population was killed in a single incident?

You're thinking too narrow.

And don't say that kind of **** is impossible, because it's supported by science with some forms of proof, and we have 6B people today.

**faded glory** · November 28, 2001, 02:06

But your assuming all these people existed.....I tell you. At the begining of recorded history there was not a whole lotta people running around. Certainly not enough to make sense from a mathematical point of view! If we had been around for 3 million years there would have been tons more people. History would of recorded this.

**Asher** · November 28, 2001, 02:10

Originally posted by faded glory
But your assuming all these people existed.....I tell you. At the begining of recorded history there was not a whole lotta people running around. Certainly not enough to make sense from a mathematical point of view! If we had been around for 3 million years there would have been tons more people. History would of recorded this.

People were running around 3 million years ago?

Better still, people were recording history 3 million years ago?

Your argument has more holes in it than a Sampan in a modern naval war.

Announcement

Somthing for evolutionist's to ponder

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment