Innocent people have gone to jail in the past, will go to jail in the present and will go to jail in the future. The whole law system blows, and it always has. This hasn't changed in the past 30 years.
Innocent people still go to jail because of bad investigative work and guilty people still walk free because of bad investigative work.
Besides a few minutes of discomfort, did this ruin your day?
I've had my car searched before in random searches at both police road blocks and while on military bases. Didn't take one slight bit of offense. Why? Because I knew there was a possibility that a criminal could actually be caught by such procedures. If so, my few minutes of discomfort were worth it IMO.
Did I like it? No, not particularly. But did it make me want to start yelling and cursing about the goddam intrusive government? No, not particularly.
You act as though a military tribunal is some kind of joke. I'd put more faith in them then in civilian court to make a good decision personally.
If one cannot be proven guilty, they're not going to get punished. It's not like everyone accused of terrorism goes right from the court house to the gallows. This isn't a goddam witch hunt.
I'd be willing to bet that more guilty people walk free then innocent people get jailed becase of the lousy legal system and technicalities. For example, because some crackhead that just murdered 5 people wasn't read his rights he goes free?
If significant evidence is available, I don't think it should matter where it came from or how it was aquired.
Anyways, I'm ranting, and this thread is getting off topic, so I'll stop.
Innocent people still go to jail because of bad investigative work and guilty people still walk free because of bad investigative work.
Loss of 4th Amendment protections reulted in me being stopped and searched by the police. I was doing nothing illegal, just walking around after dark with my best friend who was heading out to the West Coast the next day. I was 24 at the time, as was my buddy. We weren't tresspassing or smoking or drinking, suddenly three police cars are surrounding me and my buddy and going through our things.
I've had my car searched before in random searches at both police road blocks and while on military bases. Didn't take one slight bit of offense. Why? Because I knew there was a possibility that a criminal could actually be caught by such procedures. If so, my few minutes of discomfort were worth it IMO.
Did I like it? No, not particularly. But did it make me want to start yelling and cursing about the goddam intrusive government? No, not particularly.
Even if that were accepted, you're missing the bigger picture--what of the innocent people accused of terrorism and put on trial under these new guidelines? What realistic chance do they have of proving their innocence before a military tribunal? There's about an equal chance of the Carolina Panthers winning the Super Bowl this season.
If one cannot be proven guilty, they're not going to get punished. It's not like everyone accused of terrorism goes right from the court house to the gallows. This isn't a goddam witch hunt.
So hope you aren't one of the huge number of innocent people who go to prison. And with one out of every 100 Americans in the penal system, your odds are better of being convicted of something you didn't do than being in a terrorist event.
If significant evidence is available, I don't think it should matter where it came from or how it was aquired.
Anyways, I'm ranting, and this thread is getting off topic, so I'll stop.
Comment