Originally posted by Patroklos
Your support is five words from a Red Cross "confidential report" (that happens to be public???), the rest of which is not available, which itself doesn't quote or even produce the so called intelligence report.
Your support is five words from a Red Cross "confidential report" (that happens to be public???), the rest of which is not available, which itself doesn't quote or even produce the so called intelligence report.
The fact is that the RC cited the intelligence officers who made the estimates in their report to the White House. Why would they cite made-up intelligence officials when they knew the report would be confidential in the first place?
And when did "70 to 90 percent" = "90"?
as many as 90%
You post amounts to a spin on a spin on a spin based on nothing.
Comment