Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saturn's Rings Point to Pluto

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    John -
    I mean, I could argue that the ancient Sumerians/Incans/Mayans didn't have **** compared to the ancient Isrealites, whose account of creation does a far, far better job of roughly paralleling the scientific account of creation than anything done by others:
    Since you haven't read those accounts I'm talking about, how would you know?

    Oops. Well, a little forgiveness can be granted in the spirit of literary license... after all, they're trying to explain nothing less than the creation of the Universe. Anyway, where were we... oh, yeah... gravitational clumping which led to...
    Genesis does not explain the universe, it's a story about the creation of Heaven and Earth in this little corner of the universe.

    Stars and planets. Unfortunately, the ancients had God inventing plants before he made the stars that fed them, but again, they didn't know everything. And maybe the first typesetter got these last two passages backwards.
    Genesis is a very short and adulterated version of the Enuma Elish so I rely on it mainly for clues and to support other myths.

    Again, they get a few details wrong (akin to insisting that there's 12 objects in the solar system, when in fact there are thousands), but we'll give them the benefit of doubt.
    How do you know all those objects were present before the creation of earth and not a result of the celestial collisions that spawned the earth? The Enuma Elish does speak of them, they are the horde of monsters born of Tiamat as battle neared and they were scattered when Tiamat lost.

    An interloper planet with a highly elliptical retrograde orbit explains certain phenomenon from those comets we see following highly elliptical retrograde orbits. Some astronomers came up with the theiry of a nearby brown dwarf - the death star - following just that kind of arbit to explain these comets. Astronomers also say the earth got plastered about 4 billion years ago by a Mars sized object. The Enuma Elish describes just that. And astronomers are still looking for Planet X...

    So, if you want scientific accuracy in your belief system, just turn to the Bible. At least they didn't limit themselves to the creation of a mere solar system... no, the explanation of the creation of the Universe was their goal, and, for the most part, they got the general gist right.
    The solar system is exactly what the story is about, more specifically, the creation of earth and heaven. Where do you see the universe in Genesis? Look closely at how God creates Heaven and Earth? Heaven is the "firmament", or the Sumerian "hammered bracelet",
    God used to divide the waters (planets?) above from the waters below. But does Genesis say God created these waters? No, God set boundaries for the waters below and called the bound water "seas". What about the Earth? What is it? This planet? No, God called the land exposed by the receding waters "Earth", with the emphasis on dry land. So there we have definitions for Heaven and Earth and neither qualifies as the universe or this planet.

    Plus we don't have to manufacture answers by multiplying this civilizations year by that civilizations number of Gods, and then dividing it by this other civilizations number of Kings. Or whatever.
    We do when one civilization spawned the other. The word "Sar" became Caesar and Czar. Pretending there is no connection between Genesis and the Mesopotamians ignores the overwhelming consensus among scolars that the connection is real. Or you could just take Joshua's word for it, he told the hebrew upon entering the promised land that in the olden times their fathers lived in Mesopotamia and served other gods.

    DRose -
    Perhaps the signifigance of 7 lies not with Earth but with Mars when counting in-from-out.
    Mars is the 6th planet, but the number 7 is always in conjunction with earth.

    Comment


    • #47

      Erm ... Berz,

      Originally posted by DRoseDARs
      1 - Sedna (just to give it a name)
      2 - Pluto
      3 - Neptune
      4 - Uranus
      5 - Saturn
      6 - Jupiter
      7 - Mars
      8 - Earth
      9 - Venus
      10 - Mercury
      Counting inward, this assumes 10 planets (major celestial bodies) including Pluto; not including Luna (our moon) or Sol (our sun). If you're not counting Pluto as a planet, then you're missing one somewhere to make 10 planets. Unless there are 2 undiscovered planets you're talking about. Either way, counting inward from number 10 (out of 12 minus Luna and Sol) Mars is still number 7 in that method.

      Or what am I not understanding from you here?
      The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

      The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

      Comment


      • #48
        Uranus is tilted 90 degrees with respect to the orbital plane! The energy required to effect such a change in the orientation of such a large planet is immense, even by planetary astronomy standards.
        Thx for reminding me, but Uranus' equator doesn't point to Pluto.

        Saturn on the other hand has ostenatious pretty rings. However, the mass of the rings is puny. It would not require much mass or energy really to create such rings.
        It is still an indicator of a collision or disruption in the Saturnian system. But the rings are merely a visible extension of Saturn's equator so it's highly significant that they point to Pluto.

        Comment


        • #49
          Alternate arrangement; Mars still number 7 counted inward.

          1 - Sedna (Still just a name.)
          # - Pluto (Not counted as a planet. Escaped moon? Of Saturn?)
          2 - Neptune
          3 - Uranus
          4 - Saturn
          5 - Jupiter
          6 - Asteroid Belt (The remains of a planet?)
          7 - Mars
          8 - Earth
          9 - Venus
          10 - Mercury
          The cake is NOT a lie. It's so delicious and moist.

          The Weighted Companion Cube is cheating on you, that slut.

          Comment


          • #50
            Are you saying that the angular momentum of Pluto wrt the Sun is in the same direction of the spin angular momentum of Saturn?

            While that'd be a very odd co-incidence if true (I couldn't find a reference to this theory on google), I don't see how that would imply that Pluto used to be a moon of Saturn. It's true that angular momentum is conserved under a central force, but under this theory, Pluto wouldn't be subject to the same central force (first gravity due to Saturn, then gravity due to the sun) so angular momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that's assuming that the collision or whatever that caused Pluto to fly off didn't change its angular momentum
            "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
            -Bokonon

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Zkribbler


              Your terminology is 100% correct.
              thanks
              "post reported"Winston, on the barricades for freedom of speech
              "I don't like laws all over the world. Doesn't mean I am going to do anything but post about it."Jon Miller

              Comment


              • #52
                "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Ramo
                  Are you saying that the angular momentum of Pluto wrt the Sun is in the same direction of the spin angular momentum of Saturn?

                  While that'd be a very odd co-incidence if true (I couldn't find a reference to this theory on google), I don't see how that would imply that Pluto used to be a moon of Saturn. It's true that angular momentum is conserved under a central force, but under this theory, Pluto wouldn't be subject to the same central force (first gravity due to Saturn, then gravity due to the sun) so angular momentum isn't a conserved quantity, and that's assuming that the collision or whatever that caused Pluto to fly off didn't change its angular momentum
                  Do you have to bring facts into this?


                  Where are your references to ancient gods, flying pyramid builders and running widdershins around cockerels' livers?


                  I anathematize you, heretic!


                  Let all who see the unbeliever Ramo, deliver him up to the scared astrologer priests so that his liver may furnish the dinner table of the gods with wholesome pate.
                  Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                  ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Damn, I hope you're planning to bring up kids, molly. We need more of this kind of talent on this planet.
                    urgh.NSFW

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      This is all very interesting... but one question has still not been sufficiently answered: how the hell did the Sumerians know what happened 4 billion years ago???

                      aliens, atlanteans, time travellers, newt gingrich bla bla bla....

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Re: Since you *did* bring up Genesis...

                        Originally posted by Boris Godunov


                        Heehee, that made me giggle.
                        I had a few good chuckles myself when writing that.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Azazel
                          Damn, I hope you're planning to bring up kids, molly. We need more of this kind of talent on this planet.
                          I emit a baleful influence over the offspring of my partner's siblings' loins.


                          But only when Phobos and Deimos are in the third house of Cornish Yarg, Celtic god of cheese.
                          Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                          ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Yarg is all powerful

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              ....... in anything pertaining to cheese, of course

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Dracon II
                                Yarg is all powerful
                                Yarg is wholesome, and albeit neither hot nor cold, I will not spew him out of my mouth, forsoothly.


                                Attached Files
                                Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                                ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X