Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

College Football: Championship Weekend!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Texas barely beat A&M a weak school




    A&M, you mean the 20th ranked team in the BCS? A weak team? Man, you have no idea what you are talking about! I have no idea why I'm even arguing with someone like you who hasn't a clue!
    “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
    - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

    Comment


    • #92
      Have to agree with Imran here, OU beat the crap out of Texas, as they have for the last 4 years.

      Texas isn't as good as these people think.

      Michigan will smoke 'em.

      ACK!
      Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust!

      Comment


      • #93
        The computers don't take preseason into account. And they are the best argument against the human bias argument (ie, teams drop 4-6 places after a loss).
        yes they do. they take it into account way too much. usc will never fall out of first if they never lose, even if they never play a top 25 team and even if they play them close.

        That's an idiotic measure. You judge how many Top 10 teams a team has beaten after the season is over. Auburn has beaten only 1, Georgia. The others aren't good enough.
        that may work for other sports, but not for BCS college football, where a team lke tenessee, who lost twice to the same team, will get dropped from the rankings. in this thing, if you lose once, you are pretty much out of it. therefore, you take it into account at the tme of play, not at the end. does anyone really think that utah can beat miami FL? no.

        Did you watch the game? It was a total beat down. Oklahoma played ball control and rushed the ball down Texas's throat, with Peterson getting 225 yards on the ground in that game.
        of course i watched it. and how many poiints did they score? 12. apparently they didnt rush enough or they woulda put up more points.

        A&M, you mean the 20th ranked team in the BCS? A weak team? Man, you have no idea what you are talking about! I have no idea why I'm even arguing with someone like you who hasn't a clue!
        A & M is a weak team. the difference between #5 and #20 is huge. A & M started at 17 and went down.
        "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

        Comment


        • #94
          LoA: Review Auburn's schedule again. It's not a tough schedule. There are some patsies in there.
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #95
            I can't see how you can say the SEC sucked this year. It was historically weak, but so were the Big 12 and Pac 10.
            KH FOR OWNER!
            ASHER FOR CEO!!
            GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

            Comment


            • #96
              auburn played:
              #4 LSU, and won a close one. (10-9)
              #8 Tennessee, and blew them out (34 - 10)
              #5 Georgia, wasnt even close (24 - 6)
              #15 Tennessee, kinda close (38-28)

              in between, they blew out all the dozers. did OU and/or USC have a harder schedual? nope. Did Ou and/or USC win close ones aganst unranked teams and/or ranked teams? yep, especially USC who almost lost to Oregon state, Cal, AND UCLA. and this is your number one team? who can barely beat the dozers? how many top teams did OU and USC blow out? hardly any.
              "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

              Comment


              • #97
                you see imran, they rank the teams as they were at the week they were played. theres a reason for this

                "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                Comment


                • #98
                  heres how the rankings SHOULD be.

                  #1. Auburn - toughest schedual, blew out all their opponents including many top 10 teams
                  #2. OU - barely beat #20, and #22 Oklahoma St. and A&M, blew out the rest
                  #3. USC - the team of the almosts: almost lost to Cal, almost lost to Oregon St. almost lost to UCLA. PAC 10 is a weak conference
                  #4. Cal - only lost to USC, but barely. blew out everyone else, includng #21 Arizona St, with letdowns against Oregon and South Miss (wins nevertheless)
                  #5 Texas
                  #6 Utah
                  #7 Georgia
                  #8 Virginia Tech

                  have an 8 team playoff, 1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6 4 v 5 winner is the champ
                  "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    auburn played
                    Auburn also played:

                    Louisiana Monroe
                    The Citadel
                    Louisiana Tech
                    I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                    Comment


                    • and? USC played an entire conference of losers except for Cal. Washington, Washington St, Oregon St, UCLA, Stanford.
                      "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                      Comment


                      • LMU, The Citadel and LA Tech aren't losers, they're P-A-T-S-I-E-S.
                        I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                        Comment


                        • whatever you wanna call them, USC was challenged by a top 10 team once, and almost choked. how can you call them number 1 when they can barely beat #5 Cal? or #69 UCLA
                          "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                          Comment


                          • At least they didn't take weeks off, like Auburn did, to "save up" for the real games. USC didn't play a single patsie.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • what? Wash, Wash st, Oregon, Oregon St, UCLA, Stanford, all of these are losers. dont you get it? USC took the entire season off and played losers except for one game vs. Cal. the entire pac 10 is patsie if thats what you wanna call them. semantics in any case.
                              "Everything for the State, nothing against the State, nothing outside the State" - Benito Mussolini

                              Comment


                              • The difference between losers and patsies is that losers can still beat you on any given weekend while patsies have zero chance. And games against losers can still injure your players.

                                To my mind, Auburn's starters only played 9 games this year. Pretty pathetic.
                                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X