Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Queen bans fox hunting!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Ming

    Face it... the animal is KILLED just so you can eat. You could eat something else... it's not like it's life and death for you... so spare me the high and mighty crap
    there are a lot of subjects that arn't 'life or death' to me (or anyone else for that matter), it doesn't mean I can't have opinions on them.

    Comment


    • #17
      What, the US rips animals to bits with dogs now to give you a succulent turkey? Fox hunting was an inhumane way of killing animals, and that was their qualm. Killing for food is far more humane (i.e. great care is taken to cause it a minimum of suffering) than sending packs of dogs to rip an animal limb for limb.

      If you care so much about killing the things get a bloody gun.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by reds4ever
        there are a lot of subjects that arn't 'life or death' to me (or anyone else for that matter), it doesn't mean I can't have opinions on them.
        You misunderstood what I was saying... My point was you didn't have to eat meat to LIVE... you could always eat something else. You eat meat and fish because you LIKE to... and because of it, animals DIE, and in the prime of their life too...
        Keep on Civin'
        RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

        Comment


        • #19
          Ming, I don't know how to split the quotes and anwser them one by one (seriously, I don't).

          But the bottom line for me is killing for fun is wrong, and to say its 'tradition' is a cop out, living in caves is a 'tradition' we don't do it these days though do we?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Kalius
            What, the US rips animals to bits with dogs now to give you a succulent turkey? Fox hunting was an inhumane way of killing animals, and that was their qualm. Killing for food is far more humane (i.e. great care is taken to cause it a minimum of suffering) than sending packs of dogs to rip an animal limb for limb.
            In the end... the animal is dead... you can argue about it's death, but frankly, go to a chicken farm and see the miserable life they get before they get slaughtered in their prime... but I guess it's ok since you like the taste of chicken
            Keep on Civin'
            RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • #21
              reds: What you do is this:

              =====

              [ quote ]Blah blah blah spurious argument [ /quote]

              Dumbarse

              [ quote ]I love mud![ /quote ]

              So?

              ====================

              All you have to do is put [quote ] and [ /quote] around the argument, then add your own bit. Without the spaces, naturally.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Ming


                You misunderstood what I was saying... My point was you didn't have to eat meat to LIVE... you could always eat something else. You eat meat and fish because you LIKE to... and because of it, animals DIE, and in the prime of their life too...
                thats 'cos they taste nicer in their prime!

                Humans are meant to eat meat, not to chase around the countryside all day chasing one fox just for the hell of it.

                I mean, it takes 50 men and 20 odd dogs 6 hours to kill 1 fox!
                Last edited by reds4ever; November 18, 2004, 22:22.

                Comment


                • #23
                  In the end... the animal is dead... you can argue about it's death, but frankly, go to a chicken farm and see the miserable life they get before they get slaughtered in their prime... but I guess it's ok since you like the taste of chicken
                  I actually dislike chicken, especially in New Zealand, they pump water into the things just to make it look bigger. But I digress.

                  The living of the animal is irrelevant. The issue at hand is the actual killing of the animal. Killing of domesticated animals: humane in that it causes a minimum of suffering to the animal, traditional fox hunting = inhumane.

                  If the legislation banned kiddies from blocking foxholes so foxes had to spend the night in the pouring rain building a new one, I'd agree with you

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Concrete, Abstract, or Squoingy?
                    "I don't believe in giving scripting languages because the only additional power they give users is the power to create bugs." - Mike Breitkreutz, Firaxis

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Kalius
                      reds: What you do is this:

                      =====

                      [ quote ]Blah blah blah spurious argument [ /quote]

                      Dumbarse

                      [ quote ]I love mud![ /quote ]

                      So?

                      ====================

                      All you have to do is put [quote ] and [ /quote] around the argument, then add your own bit. Without the spaces, naturally.
                      Tssk, tssk,tssk
                      =================================
                      [ q ] Blah blah blah spurious argument [ / q ]

                      Dumbarse

                      [ q]I love mud![ /q]

                      So?
                      =================================
                      Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                      Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Ming


                        In the end... the animal is dead... you can argue about it's death, but frankly, go to a chicken farm and see the miserable life they get before they get slaughtered in their prime... but I guess it's ok since you like the taste of chicken
                        You are absolutely right. That's why it's good to be a vegetarian.
                        Say no to this barbarous and primitive behaviour I say
                        Hunting is fine as long as it serves its purpose which is to provide food and other items such as leather. Beyond that it is not only useless, but also cruel, and basically it's decadent in general.
                        We today are unnaturally spoiled in the way we are getting food on our plate. There's totally no respect at all for nature.
                        Hunting with a legion of dogs, and 20 other mofo's on horseback armed with a double barrel shotty is noway considerable as "hunting".

                        Hunting is much more than that, however nobody these days but primitive tribes will hunt the normal way anymore of course.
                        "An archaeologist is the best husband a women can have; the older she gets, the more interested he is in her." - Agatha Christie
                        "Non mortem timemus, sed cogitationem mortis." - Seneca

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Ming, you gotta start somewhere.

                          By your reasoning, we should allow manhunting too (not necessarily as bad idea though. )

                          No one is expecting mankind too be completely consequent, just to be improving as it's goes along.

                          Yes they are.


                          No

                          Unless, of course, it's OK to kill things, including people, just because it's useful?

                          Not ok, but less bad.
                          Animals are not people. They have no rights.

                          Matter of opinion.

                          Then again, neither should minors..
                          Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                          Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            How anyone can regard the above picture as 'fun' is beyond me.

                            Anyhow, its going to be banned and the upper classes will have go back to other 'traditional' passtimes such as bear baiting, witch dunking and marrying your sister

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by reds4ever
                              How anyone can regard the above picture as 'fun' is beyond me.

                              Anyhow, its going to be banned and the upper classes will have go back to other 'traditional' passtimes such as bear baiting, witch dunking and marrying your sister
                              I always love it when they bring in the "ohh, we HAVE to hunt them in order to controll the population", when it's the same *rse***** who introduced them into Australia.
                              Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing?
                              Then why call him God? - Epicurus

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Soon you could go hunting via the net.
                                Just when ya thought that some things can't be electronicized...
                                Visit First Cultural Industries
                                There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
                                Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X