Smiley don't forget people can babysit and deliver newspapers and volunteer and do other jobs from like 9 or 10. And you can get a piolits license at like 13.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'll be on Fox News Tomorrow
Collapse
X
-
60% of 16-19 year olds looked for work in 2000. Reduce the age group to 16-18 and you'll get a much smaller figure of people who have even worked. And that's including summer jobs, etc. You think 16 year olds will go to the polls because they're losing $50 out of their paycheck every week?And teens most definitely pay social security taxes. A large number of teens work. I know I, and all my friends had jobs in high school. A clear majority of every teen i've known has had an after school job, or a summer job. You are totally off base.
Comment
-
Wow, from 1% of teens work, to 60% of teens work, that's what you call an ex·ag·ger·a·tionCaptain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012
When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah
Comment
-
No, not really, and I get the feeling you're ignoring my arguments now.
99% of teenagers do not deal with feeding families, or holding serious jobs. Most flip burgers to pay for videogames, or work summer jobs to pay off cell phone minutes. They would not seriously consider voting Kerry or Bush based solely on the economics of their job at Burger King. And if they did, it would be a stupid vote anyway, and in an election where 500 votes can swing the balance, that's pretty important.
Comment
-
Teenage burger-flippers help fuel the tremendous growth in the manufacturing sector
Comment
-
Who are you to judge the reasons a person decides to vote? Just because they might not be your reasons, doesn't mean they aren't valid reasons.Originally posted by Wiglaf
No, not really, and I get the feeling you're ignoring my arguments now.
99% of teenagers do not deal with feeding families, or holding serious jobs. Most flip burgers to pay for videogames, or work summer jobs to pay off cell phone minutes. They would not seriously consider voting Kerry or Bush based solely on the economics of their job at Burger King. And if they did, it would be a stupid vote anyway, and in an election where 500 votes can swing the balance, that's pretty important.
But if you want to make that argument, that you need to be "feeding families" to count in this society. Then how about we disenfranchise everyone on welfare, everyone on social security, everyone drawing a pension, and hell, all single people too while we're at it.Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012
When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah
Comment
-
THat would describe damn near all Americans.Originally posted by Wiglaf
They're also unaware of it and all other economic principles
Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012
When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah
Comment
-
The 500 votes can swing the balance argument can be used to disenfranchise just about any demographic group.Visit First Cultural Industries
There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd
Comment
-
I worked. Definately more than half of my classmates held a summer job. And 50$ out of an average teen's paycheck is a helluva lot of money.Originally posted by Wiglaf
60% of 16-19 year olds looked for work in 2000. Reduce the age group to 16-18 and you'll get a much smaller figure of people who have even worked. And that's including summer jobs, etc. You think 16 year olds will go to the polls because they're losing $50 out of their paycheck every week?
Comment
-
I would agree to that.Originally posted by OzzyKP
16
I think with an mildly ambitious educational program, you could change America's voting habits to be more educated. Require all 16-18 olds to take a current events/civics class the fall semester of each national election. Maybe they carry what they learn throughout their lives. Maybe not.
Comment
-
The last government course I was required to take was in 9th grade, granted that was probably around, say 92?Originally posted by Kuciwalker
We already do take civics and government classes.
different schools obviously do things differently. At mine, we had a current events-type class that was purely optional.
I'm talking about a class purely focused on the election and issues. If your school has that, then bully for you and your school. If kids your age could actually vote, then a class like that would actually have meaning, rather than a regular bs hs course.
Comment

Comment