Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kerry will never send troops overseas for oil...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Kerry will never send troops overseas for oil...

    Originally posted by Ogie Oglethorpe


    France never turns down the opportunity for a good surrender.

    4/5 on that joke. Would have gotten full marks, but France jokes are kind of passé.
    "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

    Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

    Comment


    • #62
      Fish in a barrel. But still worth the parting shot.
      "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

      “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Sava
        OOOH LETS PUNISH TERESA FOR HAVING AN OPINION! WOMEN SHOULDN'T BE THINKING! UNLESS ITS THINKING ABOUT HOW TO MAKE ME A PIE!
        Sava, you will note that I agree with Mrs. Kerry.
        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

        Comment


        • #64
          I'm gonna try to bring this thread back on topic.



          Maybe Americans wouldn't be so greedy for oil if certain rich people didn't use so much flying around in their private Gulfstream 5 jets.
          "You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran

          Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Ned


            Sava, you will note that I agree with Mrs. Kerry.
            agree or disagree... I don't care... my problem with DanS is that he said "SHE SHOULDN'T OFFER HER OPINIONS"

            I mean... COME ON

            If she didn't say anything the righties would be saying, "OMFG we don't know where teresa stands on issues!!!! she never says anything!!!!"

            I personally don't agree with Teresa... I think oil was a factor in going to Iraq, but not Bush's top motivation. Now Cheney on the other hand... well, I'm sure he is looking out for America's best interests and not his stock options with Halliburton... RIGHT!!!!!!


            To us, it is the BEAST.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Sava
              agree or disagree... I don't care... my problem with DanS is that he said "SHE SHOULDN'T OFFER HER OPINIONS"

              I mean... COME ON

              If she didn't say anything the righties would be saying, "OMFG we don't know where teresa stands on issues!!!! she never says anything!!!!"

              I personally don't agree with Teresa... I think oil was a factor in going to Iraq, but not Bush's top motivation. Now Cheney on the other hand... well, I'm sure he is looking out for America's best interests and not his stock options with Halliburton... RIGHT!!!!!!


              Yea, that's right Sava, Cheney who is considered the most straight forward guy between the two parties, and obviously a family man, just couldn't wait to have American's sons and daughter's die so he can make another 10th of a percentage point on his stocks, of which he doesn't need. Yea, makes all the sense in the world. How about the simple fact that Halliburton is the only company in the world that can handle the services needed in this war and also, BTW, the Bosnian war.
              Lets always remember the passangers on United Flight 93, true heroes in every sense of the word!

              (Quick! Someone! Anyone! Sava! Come help! )-mrmitchell

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Sava
                Well, PROVE to me that George Bush's motive for this war WASN'T OIL, and your criticism of Teresa will be valid. If not, shut your pie hole and leave the anti-kerry whining to the likes of Fez and Diplomat.


                George Bush's only motivation for invading Iraq was his desire to invade Iraq. The invasion does not make sense in any context, whether it be the official Casus Belli of mythical WoMD, securing oil, spreading democracy, liberating Kurds, or killing off poor Americans.
                Blog | Civ2 Scenario League | leo.petr at gmail.com

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Jaguar
                  I'm gonna try to bring this thread back on topic.



                  Maybe Americans wouldn't be so greedy for oil if certain rich people didn't use so much flying around in their private Gulfstream 5 jets.
                  Nope, Prime Ingedient by Christophe for hair laquer.
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Sava
                    agree or disagree... I don't care... my problem with DanS is that he said "SHE SHOULDN'T OFFER HER OPINIONS"

                    I mean... COME ON
                    This First Lady, if she is, will be priceless.
                    http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Defiant


                      Yea, that's right Sava, Cheney who is considered the most straight forward guy between the two parties, and obviously a family man, just couldn't wait to have American's sons and daughter's die so he can make another 10th of a percentage point on his stocks, of which he doesn't need. Yea, makes all the sense in the world. How about the simple fact that Halliburton is the only company in the world that can handle the services needed in this war and also, BTW, the Bosnian war.
                      the guy is a sociopath... of course he cares more about his sotck points than American soldiers.

                      and BTW, speaking of Bosnia, Halliburton, under Cheney's leadership, overcharged the government in reconstruction in Bosnia.

                      what a great company

                      But I'm sure the NOBLE and HONORABLE Cheney was a great leader during his tenure as CEO. After he left, there was a void... and the company just turned evil.

                      Does sarcasm translate real well into type?
                      To us, it is the BEAST.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by St Leo
                        Originally posted by Sava
                        Well, PROVE to me that George Bush's motive for this war WASN'T OIL, and your criticism of Teresa will be valid. If not, shut your pie hole and leave the anti-kerry whining to the likes of Fez and Diplomat.


                        George Bush's only motivation for invading Iraq was his desire to invade Iraq. The invasion does not make sense in any context, whether it be the official Casus Belli of mythical WoMD, securing oil, spreading democracy, liberating Kurds, or killing off poor Americans.
                        Which is of course why you oppose the war.

                        BTW, just for the sake of argument, suppose that Saddam had every WMD we thought he had and also had ties to terrorists as alleged, would your opinion still hold?
                        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          btw, I blame Clinton for "outsourcing" a lot of what types like Halliburton do now that the Defense Dept. used to handle.
                          To us, it is the BEAST.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Sava

                            Does sarcasm translate real well into type?
                            No not really, we need the special saliva dripping font.
                            "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                            “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Sava
                              the guy is a sociopath... of course he cares more about his sotck points than American soldiers.

                              and BTW, speaking of Bosnia, Halliburton, under Cheney's leadership, overcharged the government in reconstruction in Bosnia.

                              what a great company

                              But I'm sure the NOBLE and HONORABLE Cheney was a great leader during his tenure as CEO. After he left, there was a void... and the company just turned evil.

                              Does sarcasm translate real well into type?
                              How do you know he overcharged the gov't? They were contracted to do 25,000 meals a day and within days got the responsibility to do 250,000 meals a day and plus the only company to be able to put out the pipeline fires, how exactly do you know if they overcharged? The gov't is reviewing the costs just like any other company would and there will be give and takes from each side. Still no proof, Sava.
                              Lets always remember the passangers on United Flight 93, true heroes in every sense of the word!

                              (Quick! Someone! Anyone! Sava! Come help! )-mrmitchell

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Ned
                                BTW, just for the sake of argument, suppose that Saddam had every WMD we thought he had and also had ties to terrorists as alleged, would your opinion still hold?
                                Even if Saddam had all the WMD, he still wasn't a threat to the US. Even if he was willing to give WMD to terrorists, domestic security is what needs to be improved. Going to get Saddam to prevent him from giving WMD's to terrorists sounds good... but what about the next whackjob dictator who has WMD? Are we going to invade every little ****hole country? Frankly, we should protect our homeland, not leave it defenseless in some vain effort to destroy a dictator.
                                To us, it is the BEAST.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X