Originally posted by David Floyd
So what? You're ignoring the issue. The specialist perceived that there was a value in laboring for a certain purpose, in exchange for a certain wage.
While you might think that he misjudged value, the specialist doesn't care. The company paying him doesn't care what you think, either, because the only thing relevant about value is what the two contracting parties agree on.
So what? You're ignoring the issue. The specialist perceived that there was a value in laboring for a certain purpose, in exchange for a certain wage.
While you might think that he misjudged value, the specialist doesn't care. The company paying him doesn't care what you think, either, because the only thing relevant about value is what the two contracting parties agree on.
Comment