Originally posted by Ramo
I know that you're just being an ass, but I'll do it anyway.
We did want Allawi. There's no doubt about that. After Chalabi fell through, he was the administration's favorite. The CIA (he was their boy after all), State love him, etc.
"[What's the point in claiming something if you're not going to back it up?]"
I know that you're just being an ass, but I'll do it anyway.

You said, "We wanted Allawi. And we pressured Brahimi into going along with it." So your "addendum" claim does not supersede the "orignial" claim?
We did want Allawi. There's no doubt about that. After Chalabi fell through, he was the administration's favorite. The CIA (he was their boy after all), State love him, etc.
Yes Allawi has CIA support, but I see no evidence (other than the circular evidence that Allawi had CIA support) that CIA, rather than State or DoD was driving US policy in Iraq at the time. as far as i can tell Allawi had been politicing the IGC rather astutely for some time, and was a genuice IGC pick.
As for the Herch article, I dont trust Hersh or his anonymous sources, and Cannistaro has taken a stance fairly consistently opposed to the intervention in Iraq.
Comment