Alright bite this, you age of consent proponents.

[Apocalypse]

I'm libertarian and think she should be in jail so seeing him again shouldn't be an issue.

[Dis]

I'm partial libertarian.

maybe I'm more lenient because she's a woman.

But I ask: How is having sex with a non-related 12 year old going to increase the chances of you having sex with your own children?

[KrazyHorse]

How is it not?

Child molesters often molest their own children. Once they've gotten to the point of seeing children as sexual objects it's not that far to doing it to your own kids.

[alva]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker
Huh?

* hint *
It's a mickeal Jackson joke.

* hint 2 *
Say it out load.

[David Floyd]

I've got worse jokes than that, but I'm not telling them in front of the mods

[Apocalypse]

Edit: bad joke deleted - and don't do it again!

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Child molesters often molest their own children. Once they've gotten to the point of seeing children as sexual objects it's not that far to doing it to your own kids.

Not to seem to defend child molestors, but that doesn't seem like good logic to me. If that were true, couldn't the same be said that once people start seeing adults as sexual objects, it's not that far from raping their siblings?

[Dis]

[OzzyKP]

Oh please, she isn't a child molester. She isn't a rapist. She isn't a vicscious predator going after children. Get real.

[OzzyKP]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Not to seem to defend child molestors, but that doesn't seem like good logic to me. If that were true, couldn't the same be said that once people start seeing adults as sexual objects, it's not that far from raping their siblings?

And don't forget those dangerous homosexuals. Those queer freaks and their homosexual agenda is to rape all the men and boys they can get their hands on. Filthy bastards.

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Not to seem to defend child molestors, but that doesn't seem like good logic to me. If that were true, couldn't the same be said that once people start seeing adults as sexual objects, it's not that far from raping their siblings?

No, and the numbers bear me out...

The point is that having sex with children is already so far out of "normal" behaviour that it's unlikely to make much difference whether or not they're related to you...

[KrazyHorse]

Originally posted by OzzyKP


And don't forget those dangerous homosexuals. Those queer freaks and their homosexual agenda is to rape all the men and boys they can get their hands on. Filthy bastards.

Read the post above this.

[Apocalypse]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Not to seem to defend child molestors, but that doesn't seem like good logic to me. If that were true, couldn't the same be said that once people start seeing adults as sexual objects, it's not that far from raping their siblings?

Because their own children are easily accessible. Siblings sometimes masturbate in front of eachother too...it's often not that uncommon when there are similar ages. Your comparison to adult siblings doesn't really work because other adults are easily available.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Apocalypse
Because their own children are easily accessible.

That wasn't the reasoning KH gave, he says its because, essentially, they get a taste for kid flesh and are ergo will see any kid as sex object.

But I agree with you in that easy access to their own kids makes them the more likely to molest them. I just think KH is putting the cart before the horse, because I think that most child molestors who molest their own kids have done it to their own kids first (and often, exclusively).

Man, this is depressing me.

[KrazyHorse]

I think that child molesters are child molesters. They don't really care what children they use.

And that argument wroks whether their first victim was their kid or not...