The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Senate officially opens debate on Gay Marriage Amendment.
To be fair, his argument is that the beliefs of wackos are more important than truth.
Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?
It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok
Originally posted by Park Avenue
Where did a lynch mob come into it?
When you advocated the assault/murder of homosexuals. Unless you only meant to advocate the assault/murder of homosexuals by individual "vigilantes," and are opposed to the assault/murder of homosexuals by groups of "vigilantes."
<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Then what exactly were you advocating when you said that vigilantism against homosexuals shouldn't be prosecuted? Did you mean that vigilantes could politely ask homosexuals to stop kissing in public?
In other words, what should vigilantes be allowed to do against homosexuals without fear of prosecution?
<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Originally posted by Park Avenue
I don't think you're understand vigilantes, really.
That doesn't answer my question. What should vigilantes be allowed to do against homosexuals without fear of prosecution? Or were you just blowing hot air before when you were advocating vigilantism?
<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>
Originally posted by Park Avenue
"The majority opinion is that assault and murder are illegal, ergo, participating in or inciting a lynching is illegal."
Majority of whom?
In a busy shopping centre, with families etc, the majority do not want to see gays touching. You need to talk within a context.
We have talked along this line before -- we already know that you support tyranny of the majority. For instance, in Nazi Germany, if it were the case that the majority of Germans had supported Hitler's Holocaust policy then I suppose the Holocaust was morally justified.
This is not godwin by the way -- it's an extreme, but legitimate example to show the repugnancy of advocating tyranny of the majority. I'm sure others can pick more moderate examples to illustrate the wrongfulness of tyranny of the majority.
And even IF it's the case that the majority of people want gays to repress themselves, gays need not submit to such bigoted demands, since gays are not the ones who have problems with gays. In other words, just because there are homophobes out there and they have their own problems with gays, does not mean I'm going to repress myself -- it's their problem, not mine.
A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
This is not godwin by the way -- it's an extreme, but legitimate example to show the repugnancy of advocating tyranny of the majority. I'm sure others can pick more moderate examples to illustrate the wrongfulness of tyranny of the majority.
Parky clearly means that the vigilantes will get together, write a polite letter and hand it to the offending couple.
Just like in frontier times.
I don't believe I shouldn't be allowed to hold hands with someone I'm in love with in public, so I'm not going to stop just because a prejudiced minority are offended by it.
If you ask me, seeing gay couples interract reminds certain people of what they want but are too afraid to go out and have, so they want to repress it.
Comment