Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What will happen if China invades Taiwan?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Mordoch
    Right now China lacks the amphibious lift capabilities to actually take Taiwan right now, and an invasion would fail even without US intervention for the immediate future. When looking at the 2010+ timeframe, a sucessfuly Chinese invasion of Taiwan suceeding without US intervention becomes fairly plausible. Taiwan needs to agreesively modernize and otherwise improve their military in order to prevent that possibility.

    I'll go ahead and post some points on this subject I made recently on another forum.

    The major reason China can't simply take over Taiwan is due to the fact that Taiwan enjoys the defensive advantage of having a large streach of ocean between them. With regards to amphibious landing operations against Taiwan, Taiwan's small size actually works against China. If Taiwan were the size of England, there would be alot of coastline for Taiwan's army and navy to protect and defend, but Taiwan's coastline means that China has little chance of simply sneaking by Taiwan's defenses and pulling off a landing.

    A Chinese invasion of Taiwan is even further complicated by the fact that the western coast of Taiwan is mostly covered by tidal mudflats that streach for miles off the coast and ensure that any transport crossing the area would get stuck, while much of the eastern part of Taiwan is cliffs rather than beaches. This leaves less than 20% of the coastline as viable for invasion and this is before you factor in that only a portion of these remaining beaches are going to be suitable for an amphibious landing. The Island of Taiwan itself has around 1,100 kilometers of coastline (its a little difficult to calculate exactly since the statistics I found included the outlying islands.) Since less than 20% of this coastline is usable for an invasion beachhead, this means that Taiwan's standing army of 200,000 could be deployed with over 910 soldier per every kilometer of Taiwan. If Taiwan's reserves are all mobilized, (which actually are 1.5 million troops) you are looking at more than 7730 soldier per every kilometer of usable invasion coastline.

    This number gets alot higher when you consider that the Taiwanese army is aware that the most viable invasion targets are the parts of Taiwan closest to Mainland China and the defense of the most attractive invasion beaches are also prioritized. The small size of Taiwan as an island means that it doesn't take defensive forces that long to react to amphibious landings and move to reinforce other units.

    As the following source notes ""China would take at least 48 hours, contingent on good weather, to make a round trip to fetch reinforcements, within which Taiwan would have successfully marshalled her troops to the battlefield."


    This delay before reinforcements arrive means that in order to hold a beachhead, China would realisticly need at least 100,000 troops to sucessfully land on the invasion target on Taiwan, (this is assuming a surprise attack with most of Taiwan's reserves not mobilized yet) and getting them there safely is not that easy.

    Taiwan's significantly sized navy and air force should certainly be able to launch some anti-shipping missiles and sink some transports early in the conflict. This is double whammy for China as not only are the troops and supplies on board lost, but that transport can't be used to provide future reinforcements.

    Besides its airforce and navy, Taiwan can also launch anti-shipping missiles from land bases, and since missiles such as the Hsiung-Feng II has roughly an 80 kilometer range (I've seen more recent evidence suggesting this range may have been extended even for the ordinary missiles of this type), they can start attacking the invading armada from quite a distance. Taiwan also has the M110A2 Self-Propelled Howitzer which has a range of more than 18 miles, as well as the LT-2000 Rocket lauched artillerly system which has a range of 28 miles and can be very lethal against the sort of tighly concentrated armada necessary to overwhelm a beach's defenses. Taiwan can also stick sea minefields in front of the possible invasion beaches as well as have its helicopter use their Hellfire anti-tank missiles to lethal effect against the invasion forces. The mines are a particular problem as they will either delay the invasion while Chinese forces clear them, leaving the transports exposed at sea and giving Taiwan more time to react, or China will lose a huge number of ships with the "Russian penal battalion method" of clearing mines. When the force get close, Taiwan plans to utilize their tank's main gun to target landing craft before they get too close to the beach, and anti-tank missiles such as the Javelin could be used in this role as well.

    The additional problem for China is that even if they accomplish the task of landing 100,000 men with the initial force, the transport force would have taken substancial attrition from Taiwan's defenses and many of the transports will need to carry additional supplies for the existing troops that had already landed. If China can't supply the beachhead with enough reinforcement, the invasion force would be overwhelmed by Taiwan's superior numbers that could be quickly deployed by this spot. If the invasion beachhead was destroyed, another fullscale invasion of Taiwan would not be a viable option for China for years untill all of the transport losses have been replaced. These are the sorts of problems China faces invading Taiwan.
    Solid analysis.

    Even without US support (7 carrier battle groups), China doesn't stand a chance which is one reason they haven't invaded over the past 50 years.

    In addition to the artillery and missles you mentioned,
    Taiwan also has about 150-200 F16's in its airforce. F16 is a perfect aircraft for a small, defensible island like Taiwan. China would be sending in some really crappy aircraft versus the F16 and would get PWNED.
    We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Mordoch
      Right now China lacks the amphibious lift capabilities to actually take Taiwan right now,
      Hmmm, a suspiciously well informed opinion
      Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..

      Look, I just don't anymore, okay?

      Comment


      • #33
        He is Aussie Secret Service.

        I think he works for DROT.
        We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln

        Comment


        • #34
          This is just an area of personal interest for me. I was concerned about the possibility of China invading Taiwan and decided to do some research to see if they could do it.

          A good place to start research on this topic would be here.



          The following 2 locations are also nice, especially with their forums.



          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Ted Striker


            Solid analysis.

            Even without US support (7 carrier battle groups), China doesn't stand a chance which is one reason they haven't invaded over the past 50 years.

            In addition to the artillery and missles you mentioned,
            Taiwan also has about 150-200 F16's in its airforce. F16 is a perfect aircraft for a small, defensible island like Taiwan. China would be sending in some really crappy aircraft versus the F16 and would get PWNED.
            Actually its 146 F-16s and 57 Mirage 2000s. Taiwan also has 128 domestically produced Ching-kuo fighters which may be somewhat inferior to the F-16s, but should be superior to all but China's most modern fighters, and should remain a threat even against them. Taiwan also has about 90 F-5E Tiger II fighters still in service with some additional ones in storage, and these should remain effective against China's older fighters and gives Taiwan some additional numbers.

            Comment


            • #36
              What a coincidence... I'm re-reading "China Attacks".



              In it, PRC explodes 2 EMP nukes over Taiwan to disable electronics, radar etc, plus uses nonlethal agents on invasion beaches and airports being taken by commandos. And still loses
              Originally posted by Serb:Please, remind me, how exactly and when exactly, Russia bullied its neighbors?
              Originally posted by Ted Striker:Go Serb !
              Originally posted by Pekka:If it was possible to capture the essentials of Sepultura in a dildo, I'd attach it to a bicycle and ride it up your azzes.

              Comment


              • #37
                Germany couldn't invade the UK when the UK had no tanks or mechanised infantry left so I can't see how China would have a hope.
                Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
                Douglas Adams (Influential author)

                Comment


                • #38
                  China would be sending in some really crappy aircraft versus the F16 and would get PWNED.
                  Ummm, the MiG29?
                  "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                  "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Mordoch

                    Actually its 146 F-16s and 57 Mirage 2000s. Taiwan also has 128 domestically produced Ching-kuo fighters which may be somewhat inferior to the F-16s, but should be superior to all but China's most modern fighters, and should remain a threat even against them. Taiwan also has about 90 F-5E Tiger II fighters still in service with some additional ones in storage, and these should remain effective against China's older fighters and gives Taiwan some additional numbers.
                    All very well... but it misses the point of a) quality of trained pilots and b) quantity of useful ammunition.

                    If Taiwan doesn't have a suffiency of both, then those planes aren't going to be any use at all.

                    One point that hasn't been mentioned yet; Taiwan's attitude to world wide patent and copyright laws. Taiwan ignores them, pirates the hell out of a lot of designers and developers, and contributes zero in return.

                    Go China!
                    Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                    "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      As if China is any different when it comes to patents and copyrights.

                      Since less than 20% of this coastline is usable for an invasion beachhead, this means that Taiwan's standing army of 200,000 could be deployed with over 910 soldier per every kilometer of Taiwan. If Taiwan's reserves are all mobilized, (which actually are 1.5 million troops) you are looking at more than 7730 soldier per every kilometer of usable invasion coastline.
                      With that kind of troop density you'd really have a stack!
                      Visit First Cultural Industries
                      There are reasons why I believe mankind should live in cities and let nature reclaim all the villages with the exception of a few we keep on display as horrific reminders of rural life.-Starchild
                      Meat eating and the dominance and force projected over animals that is acompanies it is a gateway or parallel to other prejudiced beliefs such as classism, misogyny, and even racism. -General Ludd

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Smiley
                        As if China is any different when it comes to patents and copyrights.
                        Then... how the hell did they get into the WTO?
                        Some cry `Allah O Akbar` in the street. And some carry Allah in their heart.
                        "The CIA does nothing, says nothing, allows nothing, unless its own interests are served. They are the biggest assembly of liars and theives this country ever put under one roof and they are an abomination" Deputy COS (Intel) US Army 1981-84

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          How do you think cruddy, It wasn't by following through on agreements to not crack down on dissidents,improve human rights,etc.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Whaleboy


                            Ummm, the MiG29?
                            Crappy airplane.

                            In any event, the only really superior fighter-bomber in the PLAAF's arsenal is the Su-27/33. Equlivant in capabilities to an early model F-15.

                            (as for the Migs....ask Serbia how well that worked out for them after they got shot down, repeatibly, by 20+ year Dutch F-16s)

                            EDIT: Preview is your friend.
                            Last edited by Lonestar; July 5, 2004, 14:18.
                            Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              China would not need to invade-the Chinese Strategy would be a blockade of the island to kill it economically. They could then take potshots with missiles and by air in the next few years.

                              They could always just nuke it back to the ceramic stage but then that sort of defeats the purpose.
                              If you don't like reality, change it! me
                              "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
                              "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
                              "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                I would think that Taiwan would have to go with fighters to intercept Chinese fighters, superior they might be, but I believe China would gain air superiority. THe problem is, China can come in and bomb the **** out of Taiwan, where as the other way aroudn it wouldnt' happen. Strategically speaking, if I was Taiwan, I'd use the fighters to bomb China, not so much to go against Chinese fighters. A fair amount of fighters would be used to that, but only to help AA and attack Chinese ground troops and bases in Taiwan or near it. IF it was possible, I'd use the rest to bomb China, to make the reckon the power of series of powerful airstrikes against military targets.

                                China would face serious problems however, if the US would step in to defend Taiwan and fight the Chinese air forces. That battle would be tough, and I believe if US would be very committed, it would win that battle.

                                But in the case of large surprise attack, disabling communications, satellites and Taiwanese AA and air force fields simultaniously, it could be over in one night. If the destruction delivered in that single massive attack would be succesful enough, I believe the US and the rest of the world would just result into pleading China to leave Taiwan and wouldn't retaliate with big military force. Unless Russia would support that idea with 100% backing.

                                It would create some tensions, and it remains to be seen how Russia would deal with the situation. Backing up the Chinese action would mean huge tensions between Russia and the EU, and if US would take action, it could have serious reprecussions. But at the end, I think that Russia would not back this action, and would condemn it at least in some levels, and we would just sit and watch and plead to China to get out.
                                In da butt.
                                "Do not worry if others do not understand you. Instead worry if you do not understand others." - Confucius
                                THE UNDEFEATED SUPERCITIZEN w:4 t:2 l:1 (DON'T ASK!)
                                "God is dead" - Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" - God.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X