well i guess that's why i've always got the blues
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Re-establish the Ottoman Empire?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I do extensive modding for the game Europa-Universalis II specifically around the Ottoman Empire. For the last two and half years, I've been studying the Ottomans constantly. I'm such a nerd.He's got the Midas touch.
But he touched it too much!
Hey Goldmember, Hey Goldmember!
Comment
-
I am really surprised how fond of the Ottoman Epire some people are.
The Ottoman empire might have been more tolerant than the rest of medieval Europe at some point but they never moved out of the Middle Ages.
I am sure that everybody alse whose ancestors were subjects of the would have a really hard time finding the glimpses of tollerance amid all the atrocities commited by the Ottomans.
My home town for example was burnt by the turks in 1878 so it's really hard for me to appreciate their tolerance.Quendelie axan!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sir Og
I am really surprised how fond of the Ottoman Epire some people are.
The Ottoman empire might have been more tolerant than the rest of medieval Europe at some point but they never moved out of the Middle Ages.
I am sure that everybody alse whose ancestors were subjects of the would have a really hard time finding the glimpses of tollerance amid all the atrocities commited by the Ottomans.
My home town for example was burnt by the turks in 1878 so it's really hard for me to appreciate their tolerance.Originally posted by paiktis22 They're clueless Sir Og.
I guess the point molly and che are trying to make is not that Ottomans never had committed any crimes against their christian subjects but that when compared to their contemporaries they were definitely more tolerant.
If your standard of tolerance is a total absence of any killings or mistreatments, then surely there would be few empires to survive the demands of such a standard. Putting forward examples of Ottoman killings does not detract from the assertion of their comparative tolerance.
That being said, in the absence of such a historical perspective, to admit that Ottomans were more tolerant than the rest is an unspeakable horror to many in the Balkans, whose perspective of the Turks is more shaped by what happened during their wars of liberation than by what would have happened if they were ruled by Catholic kingdoms during all that time they spent under the Ottomans."Common sense is as rare as genius" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ancyrean
whose perspective of the Turks is more shaped by what happened during their wars of liberation
(BTW che and mooly are lost cases and certaintly dont count in the equation).
And it isn't very bright either. How can our wars of liberation form our image of the turks?
i'm sure the turks formed our image of the turks (talking about old times and certaintly not just in the balkans).
anyway I see you still have a long way to go.
with friendly feelings I'm telling you this.Last edited by Bereta_Eder; June 30, 2004, 06:51.
Comment
-
Originally posted by paiktis22
That's what your reformist books want you to believe Ancyrean.
(BTW che and mooly are lost cases and certaintly dont count in the equation).
And it isn't very bright either. How can our wars of liberation form our image of the turks?
i'm sure the turks formed our image of the turks (talking about old times).
anyway I see you still have a long way to go.
with friendly feelings I'm telling you this.
Gia sou, paiktis
If you take the periods of wars of liberation as periods of intense enmity and mutual killings and atrocities, that experience leaves no room for recalling the times when people were actually thinking they were better off with the Turks than with any other major power of those times -(The point that they were better off comparatively is already put forward soundly enough here, that is, if one doesn't consider the possibility that the whole body of comparative Ottoman studies is a grand plot to glorify evil Ottomans).
For example, if you can imagine a course of history in which Turks never ventured out of Central Asia and the Balkans came under a Catholic power of say, 14th, 15th, 16th centuries, would the Balkans remain an Orthodox land? Or would it fall prey to the bitter political and religious hostilities of Christendom ravaging Europe at the time and lose its Orthodox identity? (clue: 4th Crusade (1204), reconquista (1492), 30 years war (1618-1648))"Common sense is as rare as genius" - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Comment
-
@ Danubius: I don't feel hostile towards present day Turks.
But saying that Ottoman Empire was the pinnacle of tollerance in Europe just because for a short period of time there were even worse places on the continent is ridiculous.Quendelie axan!
Comment
-
Merhaba Ancyrean
What I'm saying is:
for example we fought the Bulgarians. Brutally. Are there bad feelings between us? No.
We were occupied by the Germans. hundrends of thousands died in that war. Are there bad feelings towards them? No.
You were doing something seriosuly wrong and exceptionally brutal and inhumane to have such a bad image not only in the balkan peoples but also worldwide.
Why this image was made is not folklore but real suffering. I refer you to the lenghty article I posted for this suffering.
I think all you do is simply cover your eyes
Comment
Comment