248,000 jobs created in US last month; 947,000 in last 3

[GePap]

Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
It's somewhere around his fourth topic change of the thread, so I can't say I'm surprised...

Actually, no, the topic remain what DanS made it: how much will bush reap politically from this. If anyone is trying to be disingenous about things it is you Drakie Poo.

Any more lies to tell?

[GePap]

Originally posted by DanS
I just think it's fun to bust the left's balls on the fact that they are so morose about good economic growth. It's comical.

During Clinton's presidency, I never heard any Republican looking the gift horse in the mouth.

They were too busy Impeaching him.

In fact, I don;t remember any repugs crediting Clinton for that either...

Get is straight DanS-you can;t DanS the point of a thread, even if you do it to posts all the time. You started this, like you did in April and in may, to extol how Bush would benefit from this (this time you were even more blatant than before)-you were wrong in April and in may (his approvals are lower today)-why on earth would you be right now?

[DanS]

Bush will benefit from this good payroll growth over time. Do you seriously think he won't?

I can guarantee that everybody in the Kerry camp knows this will benefit Bush. Big time.

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by GePap
One, your point was patheticaly wrong, so, what do you speak of?

My point that growth can occur even if you aren't at a peak?

[GePap]

Oh, and to pile on drakes little Lie "but of course, he only speaks the truth!"

From 2000, again from JohnT's site:

2000 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.1 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9

So tell me again, if you can, how the average unemployment each year of clinton's term was higher than what it is today?

[GePap]

Originally posted by Kucinich


My point that growth can occur even if you aren't at a peak?

I misread your post-though, of course, you mislread mine cause I said the same thing

[DanS]

Now he's accusing people of lieing.

[GePap]

Originally posted by DanS
Bush will benefit from this good payroll growth over time. Do you seriously think he won't?

I can guarantee that everybody in the Kerry camp knows this will benefit Bush. Big time.

Wrong-and you are wrong becuase it is too late.

There was a recovery going on when Poppa got bounced too.

Iraq will dominate the news, thanks to Bush own timetable. The Transfer of power and the high price of oil will dominate the summer, leaving Bush a very small widow in september and October. If the summer was bad, he won;t get to recover.

[Verto]

Originally posted by GePap


Wrong-and you are wrong becuase it is too late.

There was a recovery going on when Poppa got bounced too.

H.W. Bush was not running against John Kerry, who can't even get the Democrat party behind him.

[GePap]

Originally posted by DanS
Now he's accusing people of lieing.

Do you read the thread DanS?

Drake accused me of lying becuase I said thee last recession recovery was in 1984. I was wrong, he said I lied.

Then he says something patently false. I just wanted to show him the cold, hard proof he was dead wrong

[GePap]

Originally posted by Verto



H.W. Bush was not running against John Kerry, who can't even get the Democrat party behind him.

Poppa didn;t jhave oil at record heights and 140,000 troops getting shot at a year after declaring "mission accomplished".

[DanS]

There was a recovery going on when Poppa got bounced too.

In 1992 before the elections, the economy created 800,000 jobs.

In 2004, the economy has already created 1.1 million jobs.

We've still got 5 months of good growth ahead of us.

[GePap]

Originally posted by DanS


In 1992 before the elections, the economy created 800,000 jobs.

In 2004, the economy has already created 1.1 million jobs.

We've still got 5 months of good growth ahead of us.

Bush has 5 months to erase the masisve job losses, which go far beyond those Poppa faced-Bush is still in a job hole over the 3.5 years.

Add to that international tensions, Iraq and Oil prices, all things Poppa did not have to deal with as extensively, and as I said before, Bush will run out of time-only so many stories get reported-more jobs has stiff and serious competition.

[DanS]

Bush has 5 months to erase the masisve job losses

Looks like he may well successfully do that. Which means, of course, that we're having massive job gains.

There's a rhetorical symmetry here.

[General Ludd]