* DinoDoc refuses to continue argueing with Atahualpa because it's going to be a long and frustrating conversation with a brick wall.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" gets US release date - June 25
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Chemical Ollie
On a side note, Moore made an interview with that Berg guy in Iraq before he was kidnapped and beheaded.
It was not included in this movie, though, and he has agreed with the family not to show it anywhere else.Rethink Refuse Reduce Reuse
Do It Ourselves
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
The point is that no matter what the loony left says this is in no way censorship.(\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
(='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
(")_(") "Starting the fire from within."
Comment
-
Just saw the film's trailer. Let me put it this way; the film will hardly leave its audience unaffected.
Could this so called censorship-debate be any more predictable and boring? Yes, it can hardly be seen as censorship as it's not the state that tried to stop the film. But one the other hand, isn't it quite obvious that the company tried to stop the film for its message, not depending on its profitability? Shouldn't this be a case for concern? M. Moore's film will get out, but he's famous (the top of an ice berg?). Isn't the cultural and political debate quite bland and boring if only 'safe' films and documentaries are distributed?
Comment
-
Last edited by DinoDoc; June 3, 2004, 08:54.I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Isn't the cultural and political debate quite bland and boring if only 'safe' films and documentaries are distributed?
es, it can hardly be seen as censorship as it's not the state that tried to stop the film.
From Merriam-Webster Online:
One entry found for censorship.
Main Entry: cen·sor·ship
Pronunciation: 'sen(t)-s&r-"ship
Function: noun
1 a : the institution, system, or practice of censoring b : the actions or practices of censors; especially : censorial control exercised repressively
2 : the office, power, or term of a Roman censor
3 : exclusion from consciousness by the psychic censor
One entry found for censor.
Main Entry: 2censor
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): cen·sored; cen·sor·ing /'sen(t)-s&-ri[ng], 'sen(t)s-ri[ng]/
: to examine in order to suppress or delete anything considered objectionable
Comment
-
/me decides to try talking with the brick wall
Why exactly do you feel that I should put out your movie (to use you as an example) if I really don't want to?I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Just saw the film's trailer. Let me put it this way; the film will hardly leave its audience unaffected.
Anyway, also Marylin Manson made good points in the interview.
Though at some point it felt like an advertising movie for canada. He could have toned that down a bit.
Nevertheless I think I gave it 9/10 on imdb.
Comment
-
I'd say that "Roger & Me" is better than "Bowling for Columbine". Sure, it has an obvious bias like all his productions. But as I see it, a bias is usually much more controlled when you work with a somewhat more limitied subject than violence in america or the US foreign policy under Walker Texas Ranger (in the case of "Roger & Me", the effects of the actions of GM in the city of Flint).
Comment
-
Why exactly do you feel that I should put out your movie (to use you as an example) if I really don't want to?
You are not important and you have no influence. You have no control and no power.
Disney on the other hand has and its not so much "doesnt matter" anymore with them. The bigger a company becomes and the more power it has, the more responsibility it has and the more it should act for a "common good" than solely for their own good. I think big companies have some kind of educational responsibility and the more pluralistic such an education is the better. The more they try to show you just one option, the worse.
Thats my opinion and I think thats a bearable disadvantage for big companies.
Of course this is hard to put into laws and I probably dont want it that way. I just feel its not good if you have power and influence that you try to steer the waggon all your way, thats not democratic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atahualpa
Why do you relate this to yourself?I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio
Comment
-
Btw, why don't you go and see the trailer at the films website ? Bush is the obvious star as usual.
There's two scenes I find particulary funny. First, there's the scene where he's holding a speech for the club of the filthy rich (or something) in toxcito and all and says "some call you the elite, I call you my base.". And base translated into arabic is? (if it's a intented joke, it's great. If it's not....). The other one is the last scene where Bush stands on the golf course, speaking out against terrorists and ends it all with "now watch this drive!" (something for Ming I guess)Last edited by Kropotkin; June 3, 2004, 09:35.
Comment
Comment