Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" gets US release date - June 25

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Moore's "Fahrenheit 9/11" gets US release date - June 25



    "Fahrenheit 9/11" gets U.S. opening date

    By Bob Tourtellotte

    LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Film director Michael Moore's anti-Bush documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11" will hit U.S. theatres on June 25 after backers Bob and Harvey Weinstein struck distribution deals for the controversial, Cannes festival award-winning film, the parties say.

    Lions Gate Entertainment and IFC Films, major players in the arena for independent movies, will release Moore's movie to theatres, and cable television network Showtime will handle the sale of rights for pay-TV.

    "Fahrenheit 9/11" caused a firestorm of publicity in May after the Walt Disney Co. refused to allow its Miramax Films unit, which is run by the Weinstein brothers, to release the movie to theatres claiming it was too politically charged.

    "Fahrenheit 9/11," which won the coveted Palm d'Or, the top prize at last month's prestigious Cannes film festival, looks at America's reaction to the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon.

    And it attempts to link U.S. President George W. Bush and his family to powerful Saudis, including the family of Osama bin Laden.

    "I think, for a large segment of the population, it is going to be a must-see film," said Jon Feltheimer, Lions Gate chief executive. "Forget the controversy, if you look at the body of Michael Moore's work. It's really good filmmaking."

    IFC Entertainment President Jonathan Sehring echoed much of Feltheimer's sentiment and said his company has a mission of being a place where independent filmmakers can come to get their voices heard by a wide audience.

    "This film will cause debate, but that is also what this country is founded on," Sehring said.

    MOORE'S VOICE

    Moore won the U.S. film industry's top honour, the Oscar, for 2002 documentary "Bowling for Columbine" about gun use, and at the ceremony that is watched by millions of television viewers he launched into a speech against the war in Iraq.

    He has said he is no fan of President Bush and wanted "Fahrenheit 9/11" to be released ahead of the November presidential election so that it might influence the outcome.

    "Everybody knows who I am and where I stand. Oh no, I'm not trying to pretend I'm being even-handed with Bush," he told Reuters in May when the controversy erupted.

    In a statement announcing the distribution deal, Moore seemed to take a swipe at Disney, thanking Lions Gate and IFC for "bringing good family entertainment" to audiences.

    Neither the Weinsteins nor Moore were available to comment, a spokesman said.

    Last week the Weinsteins cut a deal with Disney to buy back the film rights for the cost of the film, estimated at $6 million (3.3 million pounds).

    Sources near the early dealmaking said the Weinsteins were seeking agreements under which they retained ownership of the film and the distribution partners helped fund film prints and marketing then shared in box office receipts.

    Both Feltheimer and Sehring declined to comment on the financial details.

    The new distribution partners did say that they already had significant interest from theatre chains wanting to show the film and who were not shying away from the controversy.

    Sehring said they had originally wanted to release "Fahrenheit 9/11" on July 2 in about 500 theatres, but moved it up on the calendar. He said the number of theatres showing it had yet to be determined.


    Can't wait to see this even though it won't be changing who I'm voting for this fall. But I hope it changes some peoples' minds.

  • #2


    I'm not interested in it. I just don't like information to be suppressed.

    Comment


    • #3
      Great news, I will be looking forward to seeing it.
      http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

      Comment


      • #4
        It seems the award has the desired effect.
        (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
        (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
        (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Urban Ranger
          It seems the award has the desired effect.
          I would have rather have seen a film deserving of the award win it.

          This film would have been released anyways.

          Comment


          • #6
            Generally speaking, Cannes usually means s*cks to me.
            "And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you—ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man." -- JFK Inaugural, 1961
            "Extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice." -- Barry Goldwater, 1964 GOP Nomination acceptance speech (not George W. Bush 40 years later...)
            2004 Presidential Candidate
            2008 Presidential Candidate (for what its worth)

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Dissident
              I would have rather have seen a film deserving of the award win it.
              Well, Tarantino did say the film is deserving.
              (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
              (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
              (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

              Comment


              • #8
                I am curious as well.

                The kind of censorship Disney attempted should not be tolerated. At least thats what Democracy is all about and if it cant survive critics its probably not much worth.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Companies should put out movies they don't want to? What kind of laws do they have in Europe?
                  I would have rather have seen a film deserving of the award win it.
                  Sympathy ploys are used for a reason.
                  I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                  For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Companies should put out movies they don't want to?
                    Nah, the reason is that they dont like the message so they dont put it out. Thats censorship.
                    If the movie makes valid points (and it seems that it does) then it should be made available to the public. Discussion is good.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Atahualpa
                      Nah, the reason is that they dont like the message so they dont put it out. Thats censorship.
                      Second verse, same as the first. Companies should put out movies they don't want to? What kind of laws do they have in Europe?
                      If the movie makes valid points (and it seems that it does) then it should be made available to the public.
                      By a company that wants to put it out, right?

                      /me sings I'm Henry The Eighth, I Am
                      I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                      For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Atahualpa, censorship is when one person tries to silence another and is usually relevant only to a
                        state-individual relationship. It isn't censorship for me to refuse using my money to promote what you have to say. If I prevent you or your associates from using your money to promote your views, then that would be censorship.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Now, the question is, when millions of conservatives run this film down at the end of the month, how many of them will have actually seen it?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Dissident
                            I would have rather have seen a film deserving of the award win it.
                            How do you know it doesn't?

                            Politics aside, the overwhelming critical response to the movie itself has been extremely positive.

                            I'd think that most people would reserve judgment on a film being good or bad until actually seeing it. Not at the WSJ, mind you, but still...
                            Tutto nel mondo è burla

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I look forward to seeing it.
                              Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X