BREAKING NEWS: nerve gas found in road side bomb in Iraq

[Jamski]

Japher, we laugh at people with your opinions. Know this :

1.) There IS NO WAR ON TERROR
2.) Iraq has NO LINKS with the 9/11 plane crashes

If you're believing this BS, then there's simply no arguing with you. You think Al-Q and Saddam were working together? There has been no shred of evidence to indicate so. Not a single one. You need to stop spouting Fox News propaganda, and realise that there was no justification for the attack on Iraq. Afganistan, perhaps, but there were possible ties between the Taliban and Al-Q. This justification doesn't exist in Iraq.

Where has this idea come from, held only by Americans, that because of an act of violence committed by a small terroist group, that they must invade another country, under the pretense of looking for WMD. Its like saying "cake" plus "precipitation" equals "a light shade of yellow".

Where's your connection?

*sigh*

Why am I arguing with brainwashed teenagers on internet forums anyway?

-Jam

[Edan]

Originally posted by Kropotkin
This is indeed very interesting, if the alleged bomb in fact contained sarin. As I see it, there's at least two possibilites. Either there was at least some gas left in Iraq, that the insurgents got their hands on and now might be a serious thread for the coalition. Or maybe some of the foreigners that might be involved in the struggle against the coalition have shipped it into the country.

Acccording to what I heard on the news, it seems unlikely that it was brought in - the artillary shell ppears to have been Iraqi, and would have been difficult (though not impossible) to transport in).

Assuming i was Iraqi, though, it begs the question o if former regime members did planted it or some other group did. If it wasn't former regime members, how did they find it, and were they aware that it contained Sarin?

[Edan]

FAQ on Sarin

[SlowwHand]

Iraq wasn't to have scud missles at the time of the Gulf War.

Bush, Sr. - Israel. Our mutual friends at the U.N. ask that you ignore the scuds raining down on you, even though you're not involved in this effort.

Israel - Grrrrrrr. Fine For now.

Bush, Sr. - Listen, we know it's tough. Our mutual friends at the U.N. advise you hand out gas masks and hunker down.

Israel - We have the damned gas masks distributed!

Bush, Sr. - Well, that's good.
Our mutual friends at the U.N. say all will be well, eventually. Show restraint.
You've had it worse, haven't you ?


Iraq throwing scuds at Israel was like me kicking someone's little brother's ass.

[GePap]

Oh, lord, an old shell. This gets even more dubious.

Up to now, every single test done on some old Iraqi shells that innitially came up with a possible sign were wrong in the end.

if it isd an old Iraqi shell, one wonders whether simply an old shell from the Iraq-Iran war was found by insurgents and they rigged it like they have done countless times-which would make this very uninteresting news.

[debeest]

Originally posted by Japher

Both are true, or at least one, this is part of a war on terror... or did you miss that part?

Japher, while I sometime agree with your comments and sometimes agree, I generally think you're smarter than this. Even the Bush administration now rarely repeats its ridiculous innuendo that the war on Iraq had anything to do with terrorism. Why give life to their original blatant lies?

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by SlowwHand

Iraq throwing scuds at Israel was like me kicking someone's little brother's ass.

Did you just call israel an ass?

[SlowwHand]

Right. This is why some understand zip about Iraq.

[debeest]

Sarin was used in Japan. Hadn't we better invade and destroy the government of Japan too?

[Robert]

Iraque has anything to do with the war on terror.
- why is OBL mad at the USA? because they have troops in the holy land (SA)
- why were there troups in SA? To make sure that Sadam wouldn't try to attack on or another country
- *if* Sadam did indeed remove his WMD, he most obviously did it b/c of those troops
- but since these troops really really made much muslims unhappy, something must happen. Either Sadam should prove that he was to be trusted, so the troops could go home, or he should be gone.

A didn't work, and wouldn't work in any time in any year soon, thus B must happen.
Sadam must be removed. Pherhaps he had no WMD indeed, but who dares to take the risk to leave someone has lunatic as Sadam in a country that might have WMD?

Sadam is the only one who USED WMD in recent history!
NK didn't, Libya didn't, Iran didn't.......... only Sadam used weapons.
And he didn't use them for a long time, because of the american troops in SA.
And those troops were causing 9/11.

[Edan]

Originally posted by debeest
Sarin was used in Japan. Hadn't we better invade and destroy the government of Japan too?

We already did that once.

[Edan]

Sadam is the only one who USED WMD in recent history!

Iran didn't..........

[Japher]

Japher, we laugh at people with your opinions

Laugh away

1.) There IS NO WAR ON TERROR
2.) Iraq has NO LINKS with the 9/11 plane crashes

OK

You need to stop spouting Fox News propaganda, and realize that there was no justification for the attack on Iraq. Afghanistan, perhaps, but there were possible ties between the Taliban and Al-Q. This justification doesn't exist in Iraq.

Blind...

Why am I arguing with brainwashed teenagers on internet forums anyway?

I'm neither brainwashed, nor a teenager.

Spewing out such ignorant assumptions as fact, Jamski, makes me feel that you are such a poster. Countless facts have proven you otherwise, but you choosing not to acknowledge them are just as ridiculous as the conclusions I draw from them.

Even the Bush administration now rarely repeats its ridiculous innuendo that the war on Iraq had anything to do with terrorism. Why give life to their original blatant lies?

Ask Kuwait and Israel who they feared? Ask Iran and Syria why they need nuclear weapons, or better yet, why they stopped needing them once Saddam was removed from power? Your idea of what terror is eludes me, and you blindness to the reduction in terror acts, terror threats, genocide, and fascist power in the ME is annoying.

Cybershy

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
Right. This is why some understand zip about Iraq.

Don't advertize yourself.

BTW, Iraq wasn't prevented from having SCUDs until after the first US-Iraq war. And guess what, we found no SCUDs. Evyerthing the Iraqis weren't supposed to have, they either didn't have or we close on the line (like their missiles that were designed to go 150 klicks when their fueled weight was accounted for, but if not, went further) and were destroyed.

Japher, you do realize that before the war I fully expected WMDs to be found. If I'm incredulous now, it's only because every signle time they've said they found WMDs, it turns out to have been completely false.

[General Ludd]

Originally posted by CyberShy

Sadam is the only one who USED WMD in recent history!

How recent is 'recent'?