SF throws down the gauntlet to Cali

[Kuciwalker]

Originally posted by Giancarlo
You don't know what existentialism is. The only one ignorant here is you.

sig material

[Giancarlo]

Originally posted by molly bloom


Your surrejoin is, unsurprisingly, ventose.

You are pachyotous, pamprodactylous, a producer of profligate pandiculation in other persons, pantopragmatic, possibly pediculous, given over to perissology, lacking a phrontistery, and endowed with a pinguedinous pate, Pedro Poopy Pants.

You're pathetic.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by skywalker




sig material

Where did he say that??? I can't find it.

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by Giancarlo


You're pathetic.

Your exsputory ejecta, exists, eduntulous, an eructation of an exophthalmic exsuccate, sansculottic, a solanoid, spumous and steatopygic, surfeited with stultiloquence.

Pseudological puckery prosopalgic propounder of ptochogony, Pedro Poopy Pants.

[Giancarlo]

So what's with the thesaurus? What edition is it you are using?

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by molly bloom
Your exsputory ejecta, exists, eduntulous, an eructation of an exophthalmic exsuccate, sansculottic, a solanoid, spumous and steatopygic, surfeited with stultiloquence.

Pseudointellectual gobbledygook doesn't make you better than Fez.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Pseudointellectual gobbledygook doesn't make you better than Fez.

True, much less is already enough.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by molly bloom


Your exsputory ejecta, exists, eduntulous, an eructation of an exophthalmic exsuccate, sansculottic, a solanoid, spumous and steatopygic, surfeited with stultiloquence.

Pseudological puckery prosopalgic propounder of ptochogony, Pedro Poopy Pants.

[notyoueither]

Originally posted by Ned

State recognition of marriages is greatly beneficial for those who get married. It effects taxation, property rights, medical care, estates, and the interests of individuals upon seperation. Not to mention that married couples are preferred in many cases for adoption.

For this argument, nothing changes in a marriage between heteros or homos. Orientation ought to be irrelevant in obtaining the benefits that the state confers to married people.

So, in essence, you deny that the State can favor families over alternative lifestyles?

I deny that the state is being just in its definition of who can form a family.

[mrmitchell]

Your exsputory ejecta, exists, eduntulous, an eructation of an exophthalmic exsuccate, sansculottic, a solanoid, spumous and steatopygic, surfeited with stultiloquence.

I think I've seen that in fine print on a bill or something before.

EDIT: Does Webster's pay you per word?

[molly bloom]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Pseudointellectual gobbledygook doesn't make you better than Fez.

Oh, gee, DinoDoc, you mean this isn't 'The Better Than Fez' contest?

They's all right proper words, yess'um deedy do, no zoody intellerk chewall gallimaufry, no'm.

Thanks for sharing anyway. You've really humbled me, and now I'll have to consult Dr. Phil about what to do with the rest of my life.



And Pedro Poopy Pants, I'm not utilising a thesaurus, you iracundious ludibrious lingamist, you make us irrisors with your jaculated invective.

[Giancarlo]

A dictionary? Or did you hire a english professor? How much did he/she charge you?

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by molly bloom
Oh, gee, DinoDoc, you mean this isn't 'The Better Than Fez' contest?

I assumed that was the reason for the pompous tone of the post.

[MrFun]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
I assumed that was the reason for the pompous tone of the post.

DinoDoc, you also assume that people like it when you take sides with the wrong person.

[Ned]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Not to get into an argument over the Communist Manifesto but you are, unsurprisingly, wrong. What Marx decries in the pamplet is the patriarchal family, wife and children being the property of the husband/father, to do with as he pleases, to beat them, starve them, sell them, etc., all of which were quite prevelent in the 19th Century. On top of that, that men were allowed and even encouraged to seek mistresses, while women who did so would lose eveything. He's pretty clear about it.

French marriage hasn't changed, has it?