Scientists Accuse White House of Distorting Facts

[The diplomat]

Originally posted by Sava
wow your really really live in a strange little world...

this isn't just SOMEONE... it's probably 60 of the smartest people in the country. 10... yes 10 NOBEL LAUREATES.

Maybe if I repeat that enough, you will comprehend.

Of course they are super smart and well-educated. So? Just because they are super smart, doesn't mean that they can't have biases or personal motivations to lie.

Smart people can lie too you know.

[Dauphin]

Originally posted by Sava
wow your really really live in a strange little world...

this isn't just SOMEONE... it's probably 60 of the smartest people in the country. 10... yes 10 NOBEL LAUREATES.

Maybe if I repeat that enough, you will comprehend.

YOU ARE WRONG!!!

The article says 20.

[GePap]

"I don't see it as a partisan issue at all," said Russell Train, who served as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency under Presidents Richard M. Nixon and Gerald R. Ford, and who spoke in the conference call in support of the statement. "If it becomes that way I think it's because the White House chooses to make it a partisan issue," Mr. Train said.

Those Nixon demopinkocommielefties!

[Sava]

Just because they are scientists, does not mean that they can't lie. Scientists are people too, with political biases like everyone else!

Originally posted by Defiant
Yes, because they are NOBEL LAUREATES, they have no political views , lets get to the specifics and then see what other scientists have to say about their claims, fair and balanced baby, you know the term.

I'm starting to notice something about right-wingers. I mean, some people think liberals are crackpot conspiracists... but man... you should hear yourselves...

Instead of trying to present information to support your point of view... you guys just say "OMFG the scientists are politically biased."

gee, I wonder what kind of bias a former NIXON and FORD administration official has...

I'm amazed that people still harp on the same bs responses to everything that illustrates their side is wrong.

[Defiant]

Originally posted by Sava
wow your really really live in a strange little world...

this isn't just SOMEONE... it's probably 60 of the smartest people in the country. 10... yes 10 NOBEL LAUREATES.

Maybe if I repeat that enough, you will comprehend.

That's a true liberal speaking, "if I say a lie enough times, maybe you will believe it".

[Sava]

defiant, diplomat... you guys are hopeless.

[Defiant]

Originally posted by Sava
defiant, diplomat... you guys are hopeless.

Sorry Sava that we don't believe your half-trueths, and incomplete information, we just ain't those sheep you want to herd.

[Dauphin]

I'm sure these scientist probably have lobbyist motives, but I doubt they are lying or exaggerating. They aren't politicians.

[Sava]

Originally posted by Defiant
Sorry Sava that we don't believe your half-trueths, and incomplete information, we just ain't those sheep you want to herd.

sorry... I figured you were smart enough to realize these aren't my "truths"... I'm just relaying what others have said.

I'm sure these scientist probably have lobbyist motives, but I doubt they are lying or exaggerating. They aren't politicians.

from the article:

"I don't see it as a partisan issue at all," said Russell Train, who served as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency under Presidents Richard M. Nixon and Gerald R. Ford

yes this is all a democrat conspiracy

[Defiant]

Originally posted by Big Crunch
I'm sure these scientist probably have lobbyist motives, but I doubt they are lying or exaggerating. They aren't politicians.

Big Crunch,
We will never know until Sava or someone prints the report itself and then find other scientists to rebut and then see if the rebuttle can stand up as legit, but hell, we don't even have the 37 pages to review but we are supposed to all beat up on Bush without knowing the content of this claim. If you are that gullable I have some land in Louisana I would like to sell you.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Defiant


Sorry Sava that we don't believe your half-trueths, and incomplete information, we just ain't those sheep you want to herd.

Well, you are sheep, and you're used to herding. You just mistaken wolves for sheepdogs.

[Dauphin]

What am I supposed to be gullible of? And where have I beat up on Bush?

[Defiant]

You are right Che,
The sheperd that leads me to more of my money back in my pocket and kicks you commies out of my country.

[Sava]

We will never know until Sava or someone prints the report itself and then find other scientists to rebut and then see if the rebuttle can stand up as legit, but hell, we don't even have the 37 pages to review but we are supposed to all beat up on Bush without knowing the content of this claim. If you are that gullable I have some land in Louisana I would like to sell you

I think Big Crunch is one of those educated people who recognize when something is probably credible.

He's obviously not a right-wing conspiracy theory nut.

[Defiant]

Originally posted by Big Crunch
What am I supposed to be gullible of? And where have I beat up on Bush?

Big Crunch,
Review the article, it only says Bush is bad, no specific claims yet, but Sava right away is branding Bush, wouldn't want to know why?