Kerry in Sex scandal!!!!

[CharlesBHoff]

This also show how worry Bush people that they lower thenself down to this level of makeing up phony sex sandle.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
We've proven how easy it is to disrupt a campaign with a few carefully chosen words.

Considering no significant media outlets have picked up the story, I don't think there's much disruption.

[Capt Dizle]

Now that Kerry has thrown the gauntlet down, media organizations are scrambling to get their stories ready. This may break before March 2, or it may break after.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by jimmytrick
Now that Kerry has thrown the gauntlet down, media organizations are scrambling to get their stories ready. This may break before March 2, or it may break after.

I donot think so too many media outlet donot like Bush Police State Tactic against people who disagree with His Royal ******* Bush the First.

[Tripledoc]

Jimmytrick could you please give a link to that congressional testimony, which you claim is misleading.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Your conclusion does not logically proceed from your premise.

Most women hold marriage vows to be important
and
Most women would be insulted by the idea that marriage vows are not important
Therefore
The idea that marriage values are not important is anti-woman.

No sir.

A) Most men think marriage vows are important.
B) Most men would be insulted if someone said that marriage vows are not important.

Premise A & B are likely true, though I have not done a survey on the matter.

C) Therefore the idea that marriage vows are not important is anti-men.

The conclusion is just silly. There is nothing in the idea that marriage vows aren't sacred that is specifically anti-woman or anti-men.

Furthermore, you are distorting my meaning. When you are looking for toilet paper, are marriage vows relevent? When you are trying to decide whether a cloud resembles a bunny or a pony, aer marriage vows relevent? When you're looking for a freind to go golfing with, are marriage vows relevent.

What you are doing is divorcing the context and declaring that we have made a universal statement. What we have said is that when we are trying to decide upon a leader for the country, whether or not he is porking the help is of little to no relevence. It doesn't mean his position on taxes is worse. It doesn't mean he's not goin to protect u from foreign invaders. It doesn't mean he's gonna let cmpanies destroy the environment and pollute our air. It doesn't mean he's gonna raise tariffs to protect our markets. For all of the jobs that the President has to do, whether or not he is unfaithful to his wife has no relevence.

As for the value of the appearance of integrety, Catholic priests and bishops had boatloads of it, and not an insignificant number of them were raping children for generations.

Logic isnot alway correct. It right saying that all Heron user started with Pot so all Pot user are going to be Heron user can be showing to be incorrect as what hold for a small subset doesnot neccary hold for the parent group which is larger. It like saying all people who where bottle fed as than baby are going to be pot user and heron user.

[CharlesBHoff]

Originally posted by Ned


Bravo for Kerry! He testified before Congress to the many, many warcrimes of our soldiers in Vietnam. To him, the American GI is no better than NAZI SS stormtrooper/mass murderer. It is because of Kerry, and almost solely because of him, that the average American spat on returning GIs.

Bravo Kerry for standing up for America during a war!

My, how does history repeat itself!

Ned these warcrimes did happen than the america government look the other way when they happen tell awhat about America value compare to what we say how we behavior. Some highting rank America military Leader are sorry that they look the other way when these warcrimes took place. There some people in America who still belive that two sailor in our navy rape than 8 year old Jap girl on her way home from school wearing her school unfrom of short and t-shirt.

[Ned]

Her she is, Alexandra Poller

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004071781,00.html

"THIS is the girl at the centre of a sex scandal that threatens Democratic front-runner John Kerry’s run for the White House.

Presidential hopeful Kerry, dubbed the new JFK, has denied claims he had a two-year fling with brunette Alex Polier. Alex, 27, was a cross-country runner and in the world affairs club at her Philadelphia school.

One source said: “She was attractive, intelligent and one of the leaders in her year.”

She went on to graduate from Columbia University, New York, and met Kerry, 60, as she began a career as a freelance journalist.

But a probe was under way yesterday into allegations that twice-wed Kerry seduced her after inviting her to join his campaign team in spring 2001."

[Tripledoc]

The Sun article also says.

"There is no evidence to support the claims."

What?

[Ned]

Originally posted by Tripledoc
The Sun article also says.

"There is no evidence to support the claims."

What?

Perhaps the Kerry supporters need another semen-soaked dress?

[Guynemer]

Perhaps Ned needs to take another look at the source?


THE SUN.



Jesus Christ, Ned. The National Enquirer claims that Kerry shtupped Morgan Fairchild, too; why don't you post that article? It's just as reliable.

[Ned]

The source of the story is Clark, not the Sun.

[Imran Siddiqui]

And he denies it... try again, Ned.

[Ned]

Clark is a liar?

Could've fooled me?

[Imran Siddiqui]

What proof is there that he actually said it?