Kerry in Sex scandal!!!!

[chequita guevara]

Re: Re: Re: Dean

Originally posted by pchang
The posts above claimed that Dean postponed his quitting annoucement because of news of this "scandal".

I must have missed that. Could you point to that please?

[yavoon]

why are the lefties walking all over women in this thread?

"yah **** all the women u want while married, its all good in da hood dawg."

[lightblue]

Not just me that thinks that is a bit of a weak scandal then And using The Sun as a source...

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by yavoon
why are the lefties walking all over women in this thread?

"yah **** all the women u want while married, its all good in da hood dawg."

Who's walking all over women? Was anyone raped? As far as I can tell, no one has alleged that Kerry forced, coerced, or otherwise manipulated anyone into having sex with him.

[chequita guevara]

Salon's carrying the story, but from the angle of Republican attack tactics.

[yavoon]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Who's walking all over women? Was anyone raped? As far as I can tell, no one has alleged that Kerry forced, coerced, or otherwise manipulated anyone into having sex with him.

I know, but thats not the position ur taking. the position all the lefties are taking is that ****ing somethin cute on the side is nothing to even look at.

[GePap]

Originally posted by yavoon


I know, but thats not the position ur taking. the position all the lefties are taking is that ****ing somethin cute on the side is nothing to even look at.

First, how is that anti-women? By our positon, it would be no problem if hillary got some beefcake on the side on her way to the precidency.

The position is that past infidelity is not sufficient grounds for disqualification as a valid choice for president, anymore than past alcoholism and drug use is.

[yavoon]

Originally posted by GePap


First, how is that anti-women? By our positon, it would be no problem if hillary got some beefcake on the side on her way to the precidency.

The position is that past infidelity is not sufficient grounds for disqualification as a valid choice for president, anymore than past alcoholism and drug use is.

it all adds up. stop pretending issues are all magic bullets, its really starting to urk me. Obviously ****ing someone else while married does not mean ur the spawn of satan. but its also DEFINITELY NOT GOOD.

oh so ur just into a whole orgy of infidelity? yah I'm sure women LUV THAT. "hey honey I know I luv u, but she just has such a great ass!"

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by yavoon
I know, but thats not the position ur taking. the position all the lefties are taking is that ****ing somethin cute on the side is nothing to even look at.

How is this anti-woman? What, women don't like to have sex? All heterosex is rape? What?

[yavoon]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


How is this anti-woman? What, women don't like to have sex? All heterosex is rape? What?

whoa? warp my argument more? I swear half my responses to u have to be corrections of ur abusive interpretations of my posts.

no its the insinuation that the vow of a husband to his wife is of trivial importance and breaking it simply isnt a big deal.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by yavoon
it all adds up. stop pretending issues are all magic bullets, its really starting to urk me. Obviously ****ing someone else while married does not mean ur the spawn of satan. but its also DEFINITELY NOT GOOD.

Neither is it relevent to chosing a leader. It's relevent to chosing a mate, but I'm not planning on marrying Kerry, so I don't care if he's heating on his wife. It has no bearing on his ability to lead nor upon his politics. It may not be good, but in this context, neither is it bad. It is irrelevent.

[yavoon]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Neither is it relevent to chosing a leader. It's relevent to chosing a mate, but I'm not planning on marrying Kerry, so I don't care if he's heating on his wife. It has no bearing on his ability to lead nor upon his politics. It may not be good, but in this context, neither is it bad. It is irrelevent.

goes to integrity. which is relevant.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by yavoon
no its the insinuation that the vow of a husband to his wife is of trivial importance and breaking it simply isnt a big deal.

It may be of big importance to those who like to cluck their tongues, but it really has no bearing on a person's ability to lead.

[yavoon]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara


It may be of big importance to those who like to cluck their tongues, but it really has no bearing on a person's ability to lead.

obviously we disagree.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by yavoon
goes to integrity. which is relevant.

How is this anti-woman?