Counterarguments to Leviticus 20:13

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Confronted with your own ignorance on the matter,

Enough of your arrogance!

You are the one who lacks the wit to do anything other that make quote from some book,
and then pitifully claim this quote as if it is your own answer and argument.

Unimpressive.

Pathetic.

You, sir, I deem a moral coward, and too egotist to accept defeat.

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
...you immediately turn to derision, and change the subject.
Good day, sir.

By calling me ignorant, it was you who insulted first.

Such a hypocrite.

[The Mad Monk]

Hmmm...nope, sorry, not worth the trouble.

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Would you care to say that a third time? Some of our slower posters may not have gotten it the first two times.

Slower posters?

Full of insults is this mad monk...

Answer this:

So why does a removed European, living in the modern American continent,
follow precepts of some outdated book written by primitive men in a pre-classical society?

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Hmmm...nope, sorry, not worth the trouble.

Well, this reaction is not surprising.

I have seen it many times before.

When confused or confronted with questions they find awkward,
religionists readily turn to insults, abuse and mindless bible quoting.

Sound familiar, Monk?

You have vindicated the sad stereotype of the arrogant, and narrow-minded religionist perfectly.

Enjoy your closed mind.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by curtsibling
You, sir, I deem a moral coward, and too egotist to accept defeat.

I'm curious if you've considered the fact that he might not consider your questions only worth the attention he's given them.

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
I'm curious if you've considered the fact that he might not consider your questions only worth the attention he's given them.

He's still avoiding the issue.

All I am doing is trying to make people re-evaluate tired dogmatic ideas,
something certain individuals are rather loathe to do, it appears.

Sorry, but I wish him to retract that insult about me being 'ignorant'.
Because cut and pasting some old quote is not equal to being wise, and that is my whole point.

If he does so, I will retract my charge that he is arrogant and narrow-minded.

PS
And I am sure Mad Monk has a set of hands to type his own replies, DD.

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by curtsibling
All I am doing is trying to make people re-evaluate tired dogmatic ideas,

By posting stupid questions?

[DinoDoc]

Seriously though. If you want people to respond to you, it might help your cause if you were more respectful of the people your aiming for. It's a two way street.

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
By posting stupid questions?

In what way are they stupid?

Just because your narrow view disagrees?

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
Seriously though. If you want people to respond to you, it might help your cause if you were more respectful of the people your aiming for. It's a two way street.

How many times have I posted, calling any poster here an 'idiot' or a 'moron'...etc????

Never.

Because I make it my policy not to be insulting.

But I see plenty of the pious religionists here using such abuse.

Funny that...

[DinoDoc]

Originally posted by curtsibling
Because I make it my policy not to be insulting.

I call BS. I could post quotes from this very thread to illustrate this point but it would be redundant.

[curtsibling]

Originally posted by DinoDoc
I call BS. I could post quotes from this very thread to illustrate this point but it would be redundant.

Call whatever you wish, but my posting style is only insulting if you are thin skinned.

When have I ever called someone an abusive name?

I'm waiting.

Post a quote...or back off, please.

[DinoDoc]

I never said anything about "abusive names." I said being more respectful of the people you want to respond to your questions will get you a better response. If you insist on taking a narrow view of that, I can not help you.

[Spiffor]

You post gross generalizations, such as "all religionists are (insult)", "all communists are (insult)". For those of us that are targeted in the generalization, it is offensive. In the capitalism vs. communism thread, I had to force myself to remain patient. I expect may polytobbies not to force themselves this way.

[curtsibling]

Case 1:

I have spoken to one civil religionist, the rest hardly warrant respect.
Am I to wade through their egotistical abuse and then be respectful?

Case 2:

I have spoken to one civil communist, that being Spiffor.
I must admit your 'comrades' are sorely lacking in the manners dept.

And on those counts, I refuse to back down.
If I get insulted, I return fire in the same manner.

I never call names, and still have to put up with immaturity and witless comments.

So, what else do you expect?