Originally posted by Azazel
International law. As the occupier, Israel assumed repsonsibility for enforcing the peace, protecting human life and property, etc., just as the U.S. has in Iraq.
Well, but this isn't that simple. There are also Lebanese Christians that hold that territory, that claim sovereignity. It's not as if Israel has simply occupied the country, it has intervened in a civil war.
International law. As the occupier, Israel assumed repsonsibility for enforcing the peace, protecting human life and property, etc., just as the U.S. has in Iraq.
Well, but this isn't that simple. There are also Lebanese Christians that hold that territory, that claim sovereignity. It's not as if Israel has simply occupied the country, it has intervened in a civil war.
Dude, that's just semantics (and a little BS). It was an invasion, not an intervention. Israel was the real authority in Beruit and all points south. The Christian Phalagne didn't hold that territory, Israel did (and the PLO before them).
Because something like that would have gone right up the chain of command, especially as the soliders on the ground wanted to stop the massacre. Plus, from what I've read, Sharon was being updated as to the situation there.
So, why were they stopped in the end?
Because it was really making Israel look bad, even at the Reagan White House. It hard to justify your support for an invasion when the invaders are allowing a massacre to go on for days.
Comment