Florida courts: "You gay people can't adopt children"

[Berzerker]

If it was so obvious, why did you need an explanation for how homosexuals contribute to the population of unwanted children?

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

Originally posted by DRoseDARs


Following your lead: Hey Laz, your username is: Lazarus and the Gimp.

Um, yes. Almost all of us here have knowledge of how sexual reproduction works. Thank you Mr. "States the Already Widely Understood." Glad to see you are contributing useful information.

That's a great example of the point I'm making. What is at cursory glance a fatuous and unnecessary declaration actually reveals alternative definitions and motivations at closer inspection. What is a Gimp? A cripple or a pervert? How does that render the juxtaposition with the aforementioned biblical character? Or is there a third agenda at play?

It's the wise fool's capering that begs further questioning.

[DRoseDARs]

I really need to stop perusing the Apolyton forums past 12am local time.

*Sigh* Working on my response, taking a little longer than I want it too..

[Berzerker]

Yes, the bars let out recently and you may find yourself debating a bunch of drunks.

[DRoseDARs]

What the HELL is wrong with you non-Nevadans and stuff not being open 24-7-365? Freaks.

[DRoseDARs]

DAMMIT!!! All that typing, press one wrong button and it's gone.

*Sigh* Fvck it. I'm tired, I've got a long day, and threads like this tend to shorten one's lifespan if one keep's at it too long.

So instead, I post this:

And the phrase is

M'kay?

you heathen.

[Solly]

"Sometimes people experiment without altering their definitioin of their own sexuality."

Well then people like Boris are really just lying to themselves about their own sexuality as a result of the social pressures in that kind of scene.

[Bugs ****ing Bunny]

A trifle ironic given the amount of speculation about you being a closet case, Mr Gym Queen.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Park Avenue
"Sometimes people experiment without altering their definitioin of their own sexuality."

Well then people like Boris are really just lying to themselves about their own sexuality as a result of the social pressures in that kind of scene.

You can be so kind as to leave me out of whatever discussions you're having on this topic. I think you'd have learned your lesson by now.

At any rate, Laz, I had sex with a woman, singular. So I'm still one up on PA.

[Kuciwalker]

Skywalker -

You've contradicted yourself (check the bold). And homes run by heterosexual and homosexual couples are a factor when deciding which is better for adopted children. It's called "discrimination" and it is based on information... You think the people behind this law simply threw a dart at a board to arrive at their position?

"discrimination" != "discrimination based on some specific factor" !!! They are completely seperate concpets.

[chequita guevara]

Originally posted by Berzerker
chegitz -

It's called common sense. The people who've been pushing "Heather Has Two Mommies" etc obviously understand that children in homosexual homes face more "adversity" (as MV puts it) as children in traditional homes. The whole point of those books is to lessen the adversity they face...

Well then, I guess because they will face adversity, we should force mandatory sterilization on Blacks, Hispanics, and Indians, just so little white children won't make fun of them. After all, they aren't as fit parents because their children will face adversity.

Heterosexuals far outnumber homosexuals. You ask for proof of the obvious and throw that bombshell out with no support?

Sometimes I like throwing bombs. It would be interesting to see a report of gay families abusing their children. You rank conservatives would be jumping all over it to show what danger children are in from homosexuals.

Since you don't offer these examples up as evidence, one must conclude that the either so rare they slip under the radar or they don't happen at all. This would lead one to induce that, children are disproportionately more likely to abuse in a mixed-sex home than in a single-sex parent home. It's just "common sense," right?

[Agathon]

Originally posted by Berzerker

You've contradicted yourself (check the bold).

No he hasn't and you've proved yourself a total moron once again.

One can accept sorting by some factors and not by others and there is no contradiction.

I wonder how you have the gall to post of the obviously stupid rubbish you come up with. Anyone who reads this thread will see that you are mistaken about what is a trivial and commonsense issue.

[chequita guevara]

I do have to say my opinion of Berz's intellect has fallen somewhat in this thread.

[Agathon]

Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I do have to say my opinion of Berz's intellect has fallen somewhat in this thread.

Is he sick?

[MrFun]

Some people are really narrow minded and overly simplistic.

Gays do not need to have sexual intercourse with someone of the opposite gender in order to have a child of their own. This is the 21st century now, not the 19th century. Catch up with the rest of us.