Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Free Will, Where Does It Come From?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • That we live in a somewhat acausal, non-deterministic universe is proved by the fact it is here at all?
    www.my-piano.blogspot

    Comment


    • Dr Strangelove

      "You've got a lot of work left ahead of you if you're going to develop these ideas"

      Yes, I agree. It's funny how our minds can be so sure of an idea, and others are not.
      www.my-piano.blogspot

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Park Avenue
        That we live in a somewhat acausal, non-deterministic universe is proved by the fact it is here at all?
        Huh?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by skywalker
          There isn't anything BUT probabilistic and deterministic. Either the universe obeys rules, or it doesn't. It can't both not obey rules AND not not obey rules.
          That isn't what he was meaning. By 'probabalistic' PA was maening that events happen with determined probabilities (like quantum mechanics), whereas 'deterministic' is a fixed outcome for a fixed set of initial conditions. Both of these are simply obeying physical rules, and bot of these systems preclude free-will.

          Physics has already shown (to very good certainty) that the universe is not deterministic and that the rules governing the universe appear probabilistic. But since we haven't looked at everything, there is no need to assume that everything obeys physical rules.

          Comment


          • Just because quantum mechanics is probabalistic does not mean that it is acausal. Furthermore the reactions that govern the function of the brain occur at the molecular level and therefore quantum mechanics doesn't apply.
            "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
              Just because quantum mechanics is probabalistic does not mean that it is acausal.
              Exactly!

              Furthermore the reactions that govern the function of the brain occur at the molecular level and therefore quantum mechanics doesn't apply.
              Quatum machanics does still apply. QM (or rather Quantum Field Theory, which is QM's generalisation) applies at all energy scales, even macroscopic ones. In principle one should be able to use QM to describe the dynamics of everyday objects - it is just that the maths of the problem would be horrendously difficult - but it is possible in principle.

              We don't have a quantum theory of gravity yet (that works) but once we do, it should be able to [in principle] predict the motions of stars and planets etc, even though these are in the Newtonian regime.

              So if the fundamental laws are deterministic then everything is deterministic.

              Comment


              • Dr Strangelove

                Just because quantum mechanics is probabalistic does not mean that it is acausal.
                Hmm, care to explain?

                Skywalker

                Huh?
                The universe can't be completely causal, as that would surely mean it wouldn't be here. If you track back, something has to have happened without a cause.
                www.my-piano.blogspot

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Park Avenue

                  The universe can't be completely causal, as that would surely mean it wouldn't be here. If you track back, something has to have happened without a cause.
                  Yes, but the *something* can be outside. Therefore, the universe based on the fundamental laws would be completely causal, that is it would be a machine the production of which is described in the fundamentals laws. According to this, life is a very minor effect of the fundamental laws, so small that it was not taken into consideration when the machine was designed. As a result, life would not be tied by causality, but the free will, although existing, would have not effect on the outcome.
                  Statistical anomaly.
                  The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

                  Comment


                  • this is starting to sound like the matrix reloaded
                    "I bet Ikarus eats his own spunk..."
                    - BLACKENED from America's Army: Operations
                    Kramerman - Creator and Author of The Epic Tale of Navalon in the Civ III Stories Forum

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Kramerman
                      this is starting to sound like the matrix reloaded
                      I won't be scared until it starts sounding like the matrix revolutions. My life has enough forced overemoting and tepid, gratuitous confrontation as it is. It is, however, sadly lacking in cool car chases.
                      1011 1100
                      Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

                      Comment


                      • Yes, but the *something* can be outside.
                        By definition, nothing lies outside the universe, right..?
                        www.my-piano.blogspot

                        Comment


                        • Deus Ex Machina?
                          "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                          Comment


                          • Huh?
                            www.my-piano.blogspot

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Rogan Josh


                              That isn't what he was meaning. By 'probabalistic' PA was maening that events happen with determined probabilities (like quantum mechanics), whereas 'deterministic' is a fixed outcome for a fixed set of initial conditions. Both of these are simply obeying physical rules, and bot of these systems preclude free-will.

                              Physics has already shown (to very good certainty) that the universe is not deterministic and that the rules governing the universe appear probabilistic. But since we haven't looked at everything, there is no need to assume that everything obeys physical rules.
                              If there are no rules, the universe is STILL probabilistic - just everything has an equal chance of happening.

                              Actually, come to think of it, the universe is probabilistic no matter what - "deterministic" is just a subset where all of the probabilities are either 0 or 1.

                              Comment


                              • The universe can't be completely causal, as that would surely mean it wouldn't be here. If you track back, something has to have happened without a cause.


                                Or the universe could have existed forever...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X