Anti-intellectualism

[TCO]

Originally posted by Whaleboy


I'm a professional writer. Therefore, I am verbose.

Really? What do you do? And you agree with my point, no?

[TCO]

1. The ***** comment was tongue in cheek. And clearly apropos. Moron.

2. You ought to take another look at my second point. There is a difference in "accepting unfairness as right" and "learning to live as best as possible in an imprefect world.

3. You come across as just a little pompous. drop that. You're not THAT smart.

----------------

Listen to papa GP. He will help you. Don't immediately reject the trolls. Instead read between the trolls as if a zen priest had said them. And inebriated zen priest.

Seriously, laugh and joke a little. Give it a shot, Einstein.

[monkspider]

Originally posted by TCO


moron.

how so?

[TCO]

I got a couple assignments for you, if you are ready for the challenge.

[monkspider]

Originally posted by TCO
I got a couple assignments for you, if you are ready for the challenge.

Go for it.

[TCO]

Originally posted by monkspider


how so?

Actgually I really like you. You are funny. I had a reason for it. But forgot. It was a pretty subtle, tenous thing though.

[TCO]

Originally posted by monkspider


how so?

They are for Whaleboy! You are cool enough that you don't need them.

Wait, DL ALERT!!>!>!>???

[monkspider]

Originally posted by TCO


Actgually I really like you. You are funny. I had a reason for it. But forgot. It was a pretty subtle, tenous thing though.

No worries.

[monkspider]

I love you GP. You are the greatest thing to ever happen to anything.

[TCO]

DO ME BABY!

[monkspider]

Originally posted by TCO
DO ME BABY!

My boxers are already wet.

[Provost Harrison]

Break it up pervs

[TCO]

mini-mod will be hot on the trail...

[TCO]

Originally posted by Provost Harrison
Break it up pervs

you want to lose your virginity in a different way? okay,,,make a circle.

[GePap]

Originally posted by Spiffor

Did you took into consideration the fact that your "analyses" might also be wrong? You speak about how the ignorant masses should "get it", as if your message had universal truth in it, something that should be understood as true, rather than simply denied / ignored.

Obviously, this shows no arrogance from you, nosirree.

This is one point I do not get? Does anyone who make an analysis have to refrain from stating it given the possibility of it being incorrect? When eople who I would never term intelectuals make statements, most of the time they are made incomplete confidence of thier correctness. For example, Bush speaks in certainties, yet no one owuld consider him an arrogant person- if only becuase his certainties are at everyone's level.

Perhaps the people who considered something arrogant (since arrogance is measured by the beholder) consider that the person perhaps is correct, given that they may have access to information, or training in a method of analysis that one is lacking?