Originally posted by Ned
Molly, the Japanese were harsh on prisoners. Very harsh. But except for Nanking, I never heard of callous and wanton killing of men women and children by the Japanese.
I was shocked by what the Europeans did to each other in WWII. I thought that that was over -- forever -- then along come Milosevic.
There is something very wrong about Europe and I do not know that it has been fixed.
Molly, the Japanese were harsh on prisoners. Very harsh. But except for Nanking, I never heard of callous and wanton killing of men women and children by the Japanese.
I was shocked by what the Europeans did to each other in WWII. I thought that that was over -- forever -- then along come Milosevic.
There is something very wrong about Europe and I do not know that it has been fixed.
Erm... possibly the fact that we are human beings?
And human beings, while capable of some marvellous things, are also capable of great harm.
I'm not going to suggest that Europe is perfect.
I am going to suggest you've got your head up your behind if you really think one sort of human being is better than another.
I mean, what are the words... "We hold these truths to be self evident, all men are born equal" (or free or capitalist or Republican - can't remember).
Those sentiments look bloody silly compared to saying "we don't care about anywhere else but home".
As to the thread question, I would say NAZI (Not German) atrocities were systematic, and NONE of the other participants can claim they did not systematically kill civilians.
The French Resistance did. The Brits did (Dresden for sure). America dropped 2 atmoic bombs (as if the first one wasn't enough). Russia's final push into Germany has spawned many tales of horror.
And what about little old Italy's behaviour in East Africa, eh? WMD use - a hanging offence in today's world.
War is Hell, Ned. Don't you believe it's good. Sometimes it is necessary... but it is NEVER a picnic.
Comment