I think Ghandi was very much a participant in violence, he was just a general and not a footsoldier. In fact, his strategy RELIED on the opposition using violence against him. It was a very clever way of using violence unconventionally.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A belated response to Mr Orwell
Collapse
X
-
Yes it does.
Perhaps, however he was unable to stop it.
He is the father of Pakistan."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
By that logic I could conclude that anyone who doesn´t like my avatar must be stupid....
Using one doesn't make a person any "smarter" than using another.
It could've been much worse. He certainly mitigated the conflict.
Actually, Jinnah is considered the father of Pakistan.
Comment
-
I think Ghandi was very much a participant in violence, he was just a general and not a footsoldier. In fact, his strategy RELIED on the opposition using violence against him. It was a very clever way of using violence unconventionally.
And it didn't rely on the opposition using violence against him. Violence was how the Brits kept control of India. If they didn't use violence, they would lose India, and the goal would be accomplished with absolutely no bloodshed.Last edited by Ramo; January 12, 2004, 01:00."Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
Yes it does..
Perhaps, but it also could have been MUCH better if he had just done a little more.
True, but he's not"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
Ramo, if the British and other opponents had not mad themselves look so bad trying to oppress this poor old man he would not have succeeded.
Ghandi did not believe in violence, but he knew damn well his enemies were not of the same point of view. He tailored his "peaceful" strategies to suit this. He used other peoples violence for his own ends.
daft cunning of him"The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
Comment
-
You must've missed my edit:
"And it didn't rely on the opposition using violence against him. Violence was how the Brits kept control of India. If they didn't use violence, they would lose India, and the goal would be accomplished with absolutely no bloodshed.""Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
-Bokonon
Comment
-
Sigh. My attempts to troll have failed
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ted Striker
shut up Striker, you are homo-gayWe the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
Comment
Comment