Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Darwinism Extinct

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    hare krshna krshna

    Comment


    • #93
      Originally posted by Boris Godunov
      We should follow Straightdope's example. BAN HIM!!!
      They've got very strict rules for the Great Debates section.

      IIRC Horsie also got banned
      (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
      (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
      (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

      Comment


      • #94
        there are some very good arguments against drawin, I beleive the main one being that we can only trace life on earth back so far (to a certain multi/sngle cell organism) but cannot find its ancestor.

        The large problem, of course, is that it is religious nuts who have taken over the anti darwin positon and said there is a divine selector or something
        eimi men anthropos pollon logon, mikras de sophias

        Comment


        • #95
          This guy is a MORON! It has been pretty much proven that evolution is caused by 3 things, going from most important to least important:

          1. Natural selection
          2. Genetic drift
          3. Polyploidy (mostly in plants)

          Comment


          • #96
            Well I've had a more oriental version of civnation now...I suppose it makes this place complete
            Speaking of Erith:

            "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

            Comment


            • #97
              Originally posted by Urban Ranger


              They've got very strict rules for the Great Debates section.

              IIRC Horsie also got banned
              they have sticks up the butt. I'm sure Mark would appreicate it if we avenged Horsie.

              Comment


              • #98
                "One who is killer of animal, he cannot understand the spiritual science."

                Sinful life cannot help. Vina pasughnat. That is stated in the Srimad-Bhagavatam, that "One who is killer of animal, he cannot understand the spiritual science." Vina pasughnat. This is the statement. Pasughna means the animal killer. Therefore the first prohibition is stop this animal killing. Otherwise, this dull brain will not be able to understand. They are not fit for understanding. Mudha, mudha. Na mam duskrtino mudhah. Duskrtina means always engaged in sinful activities. They have got brain but their brain is being utilized only for sinful activities, they are called duskrtina. Krti, krti means good brain, and duskrti means brain is being utilized for sinful act. Therefore they are mudha. In spite of good brain, they are rascals, because brain is being utilized for sinful activities, how to set up up-to-date machinery for killing animals. Brain is being used for this purpose. Any animal can be killed with ordinary knife, but they're manufacturing latest machinery. Their brain, rascal brain is being used for that purpose. And what they will understand? They are preparing their road for going to hell. What they will understand about spiritual matters? Nature will not excuse. That is not possible. (break) That is sufficient for your being killed. Yes, sir. Wherefrom these laws come unless there is God's laws? Everyone will be killed. They are thinking that "We are not going to slaughterhouse to kill. They kill; we purchase." The Buddhist says like that. Everyone says like that. Therefore, according to Vedic scripture, those animal-eaters, they should kill them personally so that they can see how much suffering is there, so he will stop. But now the things are being done in the slaughterhouse. They do not see. They purchase very nicely packed. They do not know. And they are becoming implicated. Therefore, according to Vedic injunction, if you want to eat meat, you kill yourself in your front, in the front of goddess Kali. So that the animal will get next life as human being. He is promoted immediately. He hasn't got to go to the evolutionary process. He gets immediately. And it is given right that "After you get human form of (life), you can kill this person." You see? This is the process of bali-dana, mantra and everything.

                Comment


                • #99
                  "The frog in the well" logic illustrates that a frog residing in the atmosphere and boundary of a well cannot imagine the length and breadth of the gigantic ocean. Such a frog, when informed of the gigantic length and breadth of the ocean, first of all does not believe that there is such an ocean, and if someone assures him that factually there is such a thing, the frog then begins to measure it by imagination by means of pumping its belly as far as possible, with the result that the tiny abdomen of the frog bursts and the poor frog dies without any experience of the actual ocean. Similarly, the material scientists also want to challenge the inconceivable potency of the Lord by measuring Him with their froglike brains and their scientific achievements, but at the end they simply die unsuccessfully, like the frog.

                  [Srila Prabhupada from Srimad Bhagavatam 2.5.10]

                  Comment


                  • Moti, what is your take on how someone should find their best career?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by The Andy-Man
                      there are some very good arguments against drawin, I beleive the main one being that we can only trace life on earth back so far (to a certain multi/sngle cell organism) but cannot find its ancestor.

                      The large problem, of course, is that it is religious nuts who have taken over the anti darwin positon and said there is a divine selector or something
                      There are no good arguments against darwin - natural selection is ultimately a tautology. Moreover, evolution states NOTHING about the origin of life

                      Comment


                      • Moti: How many times are you going to copy-paste that "frog in the well" crap?
                        <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                        Comment


                        • Moti: How many times are you going to copy-paste that "frog in the well" crap?


                          until you learn to understand, duh!


                          Comment


                          • Moti, you have a lot of good points. There is a great deal of truth in what you have posted. But it should be remembered, that everything, Darwinism included, has a purpose.
                            http://monkspider.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • Moti, I dont think your frog in a well argument applies here since you havent been answering our questions. We have been, albeit sarcastically for the most part, trying to understand what you believe but the fact that you arent responding doesnt help. A bunch of quotes from dead people are as good as a check no?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X