Dirtbag Scumbags of the Right

[JohnT]

Permit me to

Of course agricultural subsidies by other nations kill no-one, just American subsidies?

And how does Bayer feel about allowing African countries manufacture their latest meds?

Of course, if you want to pull statistics out of your ass, please, by all means, do so.

[DinoDoc]

Are you drunk Sava?

[Winston]

I think this thread should be topped for its exceptional entertainment value, which seems to be improving with each new post by the thread starter.

[Tripledoc]

No-one answer my hypothesis.

Is:

Republican supporters are homosexual.

Thesis rest on. They don't know how to treat women correctly. Not even when it is startegic.

[Imran Siddiqui]

On the other hand, American imperialism is much more dangerous in that it springs from itself with no other reason than pleasing its huge corporations. And it is winning, while Hitler was obviously doomed to failure.
In such a way, we can consider it more dangerous. Remember, danger is about potential threat, not past one.

Also permit me to .

Because the expanse of the free market is just as bad as Hitler's genocide? If you believe that, then I got a bridge in Arizona I'd like to sell you.

[JohnT]

"They don't know how to treat women correctly. "

Believe it or not, for Xmas (and because I'm bored) I asked my wife to participate in an "Ask Mrs. JohnT anything" thread, and she agreed. You can ask her then if Republicans know how to treat women properly.

[Fake Boris]

Originally posted by JohnT
Permit me to

Of course agricultural subsidies by other nations kill no-one, just American subsidies?

And how does Bayer feel about allowing African countries manufacture their latest meds?

Of course, if you want to pull statistics out of your ass, please, by all means, do so.

I said "caused in part". IN PART.
Never said the others are any better. USA are the worse because they are the most powerful, that's all. Nothing else. Throughout history, the worst usually came from the most powerful ones. Now that doesn't come out of my ass. Plain logics, that is.

And Bayer? Remember "indirect deaths caused by economic policy". Indirect. Which means USA is valuing Bayer's profits over the life of millions. Fine. Now they are working to make it stay that way. Increase the length of patents duration. Impose economic sanctions against governments trying to manufacture their own drugs. Now I love the way you put it: "how does Bayer feel?". That's correct.

US government=Bayer. I call this a threat.
Personnally, how do YOU feel? would you rather allow millions to be cured, or see Bayer's president get a few more millions in stock-options?

Saying "all right, countries with X AIDS problems or X poverty can make their own" is not hard at all.

But since US GOVERNMENT=BAYER+MEDIA TRUSTS, they'll make sure you don't even want this to happen. If ever you do, they still have the police and the army.

[Boris Godunov]

Originally posted by Tripledoc
No-one answer my hypothesis.

Is:

Republican supporters are homosexual.

Thesis rest on. They don't know how to treat women correctly. Not even when it is startegic.

Homosexuals can't treat women correctly? Considering you seem to have a problem with treating human beings correctly, making this charge is laughable.

I'm hoping this is all just a troll, because if you're really this brayingly stupid, I have to wonder how you survived this long without poisoning yourself on lead paint chips at some point.

[Imran Siddiqui]

Which means USA is valuing Bayer's profits over the life of millions.

Bayer's profits allow it to save billions (through R&D). So would you rather see, millions or billions dead? Looks like you picked billions, you butcher .

[DinoDoc]

This thread is amusing.

[Ned]

Originally posted by Winston
I think this thread should be topped for its exceptional entertainment value, which seems to be improving with each new post by the thread starter.

[Fake Boris]

Also permit me to .

Because the expanse of the free market is just as bad as Hitler's genocide? If you believe that, then I got a bridge in Arizona I'd like to sell you.

My point is:

1. It has BEEN devastating, but not as much as Hitler's genocide. But we are still talking millions of people here, remember.
2. It has the POTENTIAL to become worse. Have you had any news from Bolivia recently? Probably not. America offered a few bucks of economic "help" that will probably end up in the president's bank account. In return, Bolivia agreed to sell public-held electricity and water companies to American corporations (at ridiculous cost). Prices are on the rise, less people can afford to have such basic commodites. Angry mob protests. 70 deaths. What does the US have to say: "the Bolivian government was legitimately defending itself against dangerous revolutionaries".
Events like this happen a few times every week throughout the world.

[JohnT]

And Bayer? Remember "indirect deaths caused by economic policy". Indirect. Which means USA is valuing Bayer's profits over the life of millions. Fine. Now they are working to make it stay that way. Increase the length of patents duration. Impose economic sanctions against governments trying to manufacture their own drugs. Now I love the way you put it: "how does Bayer feel?". That's correct.

Bayer is a German company. Being European, I thought you would know that. If you don't like how they conduct business, go and whine at the Germans.

[Imran Siddiqui]

It has BEEN devastating, but not as much as Hitler's genocide. But we are still talking millions of people here, remember.

Overall, it's been a benefit, so no, I wouldn't say it was devestating. It's been good for the world. At least you can admit SOME good has come from it, which is more than you can say for the genocide.

It has the POTENTIAL to become worse.

And also much better. Everything has the potential to become worse. It will still be a net gain.

[Tripledoc]

Originally posted by Boris Godunov


Homosexuals can't treat women correctly? Considering you seem to have a problem with treating human beings correctly, making this charge is laughable.

I'm hoping this is all just a troll, because if you're really this brayingly stupid, I have to wonder how you survived this long without poisoning yourself on lead paint chips at some point.

I never said that homosexuals can't treat woman correctly. Homosexual can treat woman very good.

However many socalled 'butch' homosexuals have very bad experience with woman. They stay in trenches too long. Or they are in strange schools. Or they are too long with stockbrokers.