We should have a faster way of saying it than Native-American, though.
reds.
'cept that has a commie connotation.
savages.
but that perpetuates the white man's burden bull****.
kemosabe.
except, didn't that refer to a white dude?
tonto.
could work, but i'm sure there's more variety in names.
you could always make the difference by calling them woo-woo injuns and dot injuns.
Obviously a South African would not be an African-American because they are not American.
that answer is a bit disingenuous.
doesn't dave matthews make his home here? isn't he a south african-american? an african-american?
we have a priest here by the name of fr. sullivan. his ancestry's irish, but he's from zimbabwe, and has had three generations of his family born there. he's now here in atlanta as an immigrant. is he not african american, even if he is pasty white?
what's wrong with the term black?
or strongly pigmented american?
Personally, I have a problem with the phrase "(fill in the blank)-American". I think the only word that matters is "American". We are all Americans (or at least those of you from the U.S. who are reading this) and that is the only thing that matters. Filling in that blank above is divisive.
i tend to agree... however, you run can into thorny troubles with that, particularly if you're looking from a different slope like me. (badump bump tshh!)
if you look foreign, people are going to attach just the (fill in the blank) part without adding the american part. when describing people of our slanted nature, we're almost always described first as asians, then as americans.
i agree that we're all americans. that doesn't mean that such x-american terms don't have their uses--asian americans need to use it to underscore the fact that we're not going back to some "mother home country land".
Comment