Heterosexuality is one of the culturally sanctioned ways we have of making sense of the world, just like religion and language. When the sanctity of these institutions are challenged by others with a minority viewpoint, then there will always be a backlash from those in the majority who are ambivalent about the culturally-sanctioned choices they've made. The very foundation of their existence is being challenged by such a confrontation. They might have to rethink their whole lives as a result. Thats too painful a choice. It's easier to lash out at the minority in such cases.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
What is the fundamental root of homophobia?
Collapse
X
-
People are totally capable of tolerance, but you can stretch this too far. As much as it may offend someones ideology, human binegs like to split people up into recongnizable groups so that they can more easily deal with them. But how many of these groups do they want to make? More and more groups are clamoring for recognition. we are finally seeing some headway in race issues after so much resistance, asking them to accept and tolerate yet another group when they are still struggling with others is just stretcing it.
Basically, homosexuality being out in the open, in this age, is relatively new. It takes decades if not centuries for a group of people who are not open to accepting an idea to get over it, we can expect the same here.
-Pat"The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrFun
Well, there are a couple of Apolytoners on here that I perceive as being homophobic.
And Shi -- I can't swallow your explanation on why you think secular homophobia is more virulent than hard-religious homophobia."I'm moving to the Left" - Lancer
"I imagine the neighbors on your right are estatic." - Slowwhand
Comment
-
The Cure for Homophobia:
Take homophobe and transplant them to the SF Bay Area, or any major metropolitan in CA... For extreme cases, put them in The Castro District (SF) or Hollywood.
When I got out of HS I was homophobic, but then in College I had several friends come out of the closet... I was disturbed at first, and then realized that they were no different. I have since made friends with ppl I like and don't care much for their sexual preferences. Some of this has to do with my detattchment from religious establishments, as well as the liberal influences obtained through higher education and being in California my whole life, a state which is more accepting of alternative lifestyles.
Thus, religion, education, and society all have a play on whether someone is homophobic or not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caligastia
I think most hetero men who have a problem with gays can't get past the idea of anal sex.Christianity: The belief that a cosmic Jewish Zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree...
Comment
-
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I think it has more to do with not being able to look at someone else's hairy, sweaty genitals....people like to cry a lot... - Pekka
...we just argue without evidence, secure in our own superiority. - Snotty
Comment
-
Re: What is the fundamental root of homophobia?
Originally posted by MrFun
Does the fundamental root of homophobia lie in individual-oriented psychology, or within a broader sociological factor??
I have thought about this the past few days, and here is what I think.
The root of homophobia lies in conservative heterosexuals' desire to externalize an internal problem that is perceived to exist within heterosexual society. In other words, that these particular heterosexuals want to scapegoat homosexuals for what they perceive as being problematic but is originating from within heterosexual society.
The problem that these conservative heterosexuals perceive, is that marriage as how it has traditionally been held in high-esteem (whether that is mythical history, or historical reality is another question) has degenerated to a mere pact of convenience that can be disavowed if it becomes "inconvenient" to maintain that marriage.
Whether or not the sacredeness of marriage was EVER a reality in some past period, is another question. Here, I'm talking about conservative heterosexuals who PERCEIVE this idealized vision of what marriage used to be like, compared to what they perceive the state of marriage today, as an institution.
So, this perceived degradation of marriage is not happening because of homosexuals -- it is within heterosexual society that marriage has been degraded -- based on the biased perceptions of conservative heterosexuals. Marriage/family within heterosexual society has long-since changed:
1) 50% or more heterosexuals divorce rather than working out issues that could be worked out in many of these marriages.
2) Heterosexuals are part of the social phenomenon of drive-through, Las Vegas style weddings.
3) There are an increasing number of non-traditional, but still heterosexual-oriented families (foster families, children raised by grandparents, single parent families, and so on)
It seems like society might be in a transitional period, where the traditional, agrarian-based family has ultimately failed to adapt to post-industrial, modern society and as a result, there will be fundamental changes in the future (we can't foresee what the results will be though).
So, it could be that conservative heterosexuals who are mortified by the above societal factors and developments, see these changes as being completely problematic. Instead of advocating for adapting to new concepts of family to stabliize our society, they argue for holding onto what MIGHT be anachronistic values that no longer apply to the reality of post-industrial modern society.
And they seek to hold onto what might be anachronistic concepts of family by externalizing these internal problems within heterosexual society, onto a group of people they can scapegoat -- homosexuals. Rather than face what they perceive to be problems within heterosexual society through adaptation, they want to scapegoat homosexuals to hold onto what might be just sentimental, anachronistic concepts of family.
These conservative heterosexuals may be venting their anger about these internal problems of heterosexual society by lashing out against homosexuals.
What does anyone think about these thoughts? Do you have ideas on how this idea can be further reinforced, or do you have a completely different idea from this?
And are the changes within heterosexual society towards concept of family simply PERCEIVED as degradation, and is it really just transitory change that could bring either good OR bad results??
I think that homophobia is much simpler that what you make it out to be. It I think is the same as racism. People fear what is different and thus hate it. And since they hate it, they try to find reasons to hate it. Like people blaming Jews for all kinds of problems the have nothing to do with.
I dont think homophobia is arround because conservatives are looking for a escape goat.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Sexism is the root of homophobia. Men and women have defined roles within society. Feminists undermine it from one direction, and gays from another.
And vice versa, btw.
Comment
Comment