Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bush grants interview to the Sun

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Look at it like this. If the Belgrano wasn't sunk, it could have caused the death of British soldiers. So, the Sun was celebrating the fact that British soldiers would not be killed. Again, the British weren't wrong in this war. Argentina was.
    Was sailing away from the Islands, and was initially outside of the exclusion zone and still sailing in the opposite direction. It was not a legitimate target as it was not within that zone (though I believe it was extended... MtG???).

    Your argument is like the assertation that people were justified in celebrating after Hiroshima! There are no winners in war, only survivors. The Belgrano was posing no threat at that time, and was not a legitimate target. Understand that I'm not talking about the rights and wrongs of the war itself, as the attacked, Britain had the right to defend itself. However, that does not excuse the issue that war is a tragedy, whether or not, in this case, you are British or Argentine. You are human first.
    "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
    "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

    Comment


    • #32
      You have to remember that the Falklands War only became a "war" after it was finished. At the time, it was presented as a military action to re-occupy sovereign British territory. That meant that we defined the rules of the conflict.

      Then we promptly broke our own rules. The next step would presumably have been attacking targets on Argentinian soil.

      In any event, the Belgrano wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes if it got within gun range of the islands or the task force. 8-inch guns aren't much use at shooting down Sea Harriers.
      The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

      Comment


      • #33
        Hiroshima was an attack against civilians - ie, a terror attack. Sinking the Belgrano was an attack on a valid military target. There is no comparison.

        As to the exclusion zone, I'm not an expert, but I would rather assume that this exclusion zone applied, like most others, to FOREIGN vessels (ie, non-British, non-Argentine). British naval vessels could of course enter, and Argentine vessels were targets both within and without.

        That's just an assumption, though - I don't actually know.
        Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
        Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #34
          In any event, the Belgrano wouldn't have lasted 5 minutes if it got within gun range of the islands or the task force. 8-inch guns aren't much use at shooting down Sea Harriers.
          If it got within gun range of a British "carrier", then the 8 inch guns would probably do a bit of damage before the Harriers sunk the Belgrano. Same thing WRT the islands themselves.
          Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
          Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

          Comment


          • #35
            Wasn't a british ship sunk in the malvidas? By a french rocket or something?

            Comment


            • #36
              It was a zone within which Britain could attack Argentine military vessels.

              My point remains unchanged whether the target is military or civilian. Humans died. The Sun was celebrating this tragedy. I cannot find that acceptable. Yes the war was Argentina's fault. So the Sun was justified in celebrating the deaths of humans? . Has the psyche of the idiot actually changed since the Crusades?
              "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
              "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

              Comment


              • #37
                OK, fine. Then by that argument, the US wouldn't be justified celebrating the victory at Yorktown, during the Revolution
                Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                Comment


                • #38
                  If it got within gun range of a British "carrier", then the 8 inch guns would probably do a bit of damage before the Harriers sunk the Belgrano. Same thing WRT the islands themselves.
                  If she ship had entered the exclusion zone, from which it was sailing away, and had been for some time, then it would have been promptly sunk.

                  Wasn't a british ship sunk in the malvidas? By a french rocket or something?
                  The HMS Sheffield IIRC, by an Exocet missile fired from an Argentine jet. Stupid RN building their ships out of aluminium .
                  "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                  "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by paiktis22
                    Wasn't a british ship sunk in the malvidas? By a french rocket or something?
                    6 British ships were sunk, or severely damaged. Exocets took out the "Coventry", the "Sheffield", the "Ardent" and the "Antelope". Iron bombs took out the "Sir Galahad" and "Sir Tristram" in Bluff Cove.
                    The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Having a zone in which you are allowed to attack military vessels of a nation with which you are at war is stupid. In any case, though, the British breaking their own rules does not matter one bit WRT the Sun celebrating the sinking.
                      Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
                      Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        So it was a full fledged war, wasn't it?

                        Why the brits are prortrayed as the slaughters on this war?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          OK, fine. Then by that argument, the US wouldn't be justified celebrating the victory at Yorktown, during the Revolution
                          Correct.
                          "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                          "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by David Floyd
                            OK, fine. Then by that argument, the US wouldn't be justified celebrating the victory at Yorktown, during the Revolution
                            That's up to the Americans. A nation tends to decide on whether its actions are justified according to its own merits, and the "Belgrano" is generally considered rather unsporting.
                            The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Turns out Cheney had repeatedly blown off British ambassador, Meyer, when pressed for planning on post-war Iraq.
                              British warnings that America was failing before the war to prepare properly for a crumbling security situation in Iraq after Saddam Hussein was ousted were ignored by Vice President Dick Cheney and the Pentagon.
                              Last edited by Ramo; November 18, 2003, 16:12.
                              "Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. "
                              -Bokonon

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by David Floyd
                                I'd have to have more info about this.

                                The action.May 2, 1982

                                Belaunde Terry, President of Peru, presents a peace proposal to Argentine President Leopoldo Galtieri, who gives a preliminary acceptance with some proposed modifications. Before the Argentine junta ratifies the acceptance, British submarine HMS Conqueror sinks the Argentine cruiser General Belgrano outside the war zone and while sailing away from the islands. Almost 400 crewmen die. At this point the junta rejects the proposal.

                                And the response. May 4, 1982 and forwards

                                Argentine air attacks from Super Etendard fighter planes using Exocet air to surface missiles sink the British destroyer HMS Sheffield with twenty men on board. One British Harrier plane is shot down.

                                The British HMS Ardent is sunk by an Argentine air attack. Nine Argentine aircraft shot down.

                                The British HMS Antelope is attacked and sinks after unexploded bomb detonates. Ten Argentine aircraft destroyed.

                                HMS Coventry is hit by 3 1000 lb air bombs dropped from Argentine Skyhawks; 19 British dead. The MV Atlantic Conveyor is hit by an Exocet missile and sinks 3 days later, 12 more British dead.

                                An Argentine air attack on British landing craft Sir Galahad and Sir Tristam at Port Pleasant south of Bluff Cove. 50 British die.

                                The cruiser HMS Glamorgan is hit by an Exocet missile as it was bombarding on shore Argentine positions. 13 British die.
                                Source

                                Margaet Thatcher refused peace negotiations, risked military defeat, and this to be re-elected

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X