People with 'defects' acquired, or otherwise, continue to contribute to society in ways too numerous to mention.
When did I argue otherwise? I simply said that a person with Down's Syndrome clearly has a developmental defect, even if they "contribute to society in ways too numerous to mention", as some do.
Sorry, I'm not buying the "can't procreate = defect" argument.
It's more of a "have a brain structure that is clearly different than the vast majority of the human population that leads to sexual behavior that is clearly different than the vast majority of the human population" argument. Seems like a pretty clear case of a developmental defect, if it is ever conclusively proven.
Comment