Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
They favor an authoritarian, militarized government that seeks to roll back civil liberties and that rules on behalf of corporations rather than citizens. They place might above right. They seek to stifle all dissent, telling Americans that they'd "better watch what they say." They've created false threats in order to consolidate their power and achieve their aims. They've cast aspersions on the patriotism of anyone who has dared to question them.
That's pretty much your textbook definition of fascism. A kinder, gentler fascism, to be sure, but fascism nevertheless.
They favor an authoritarian, militarized government that seeks to roll back civil liberties and that rules on behalf of corporations rather than citizens. They place might above right. They seek to stifle all dissent, telling Americans that they'd "better watch what they say." They've created false threats in order to consolidate their power and achieve their aims. They've cast aspersions on the patriotism of anyone who has dared to question them.
That's pretty much your textbook definition of fascism. A kinder, gentler fascism, to be sure, but fascism nevertheless.
What bothers me about the Bush regime is his lack of consistency. He favors the liberation of Iraq to bring freedom to an oppressed people, but returns Cuban refugees to Cuba to be killed or whatever at the whim of the Castro dictatorship. He allows spending to go way out of control creating a deficit that is becoming an embarrassment. He imposes tarriff restrictions on steel to pander to the steel unions. He is against terrorism but tolerates Arafat.
In most aspects, Bush has promoted the Democrat agenda and has stiffed conservatives. He has angered conservative America deeply.
Bush is no conservative except perhaps on social issues where he has continued to resist abortion and the use of fetus's for reseach. But your post, Rufus, does not even mention this.
Comment