She would have died anyway.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
American soldiers kill tiger in Baghdad
Collapse
X
-
So that's why you haven't been able to kill him yet.Originally posted by Uncle Sparky
Doesn't "Osama" mean "eye of the tiger" ?Världsstad - Dom lokala genrenas vän
Mick102, 102,3 Umeå, Måndagar 20-21
Comment
-
That's what I'm talking about!!!Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I do feel bad for the tiger, but that's life. The tiger met a bigger badass than she was, the US military.
USA!!!
We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. - Abraham Lincoln
Comment
-
Bah, obviously that GI was a Darwin Awards contestant that now will be allowed to infect the gene pool..why not shoot him and take him out of his misery and make the tiger happy?If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Exactly what I was thinking.Originally posted by Sandman
I don't really care about the tiger, but what the hell were they doing 'having a party in Baghdad Zoo'?"You're the biggest user of hindsight that I've ever known. Your favorite team, in any sport, is the one that just won. If you were a woman, you'd likely be a slut." - Slowwhand, to Imran
Eschewing silly games since December 4, 2005
Comment
-
I'd like to know if that soldier had been drinking because petting tigers isn't something a sane person does.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
It's called natural selectionBah, obviously that GI was a Darwin Awards contestant that now will be allowed to infect the gene pool..why not shoot him and take him out of his misery and make the tiger happy?
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DaveDaDouche
Read my seldom updated blog where I talk to myself: http://davedadouche.blogspot.com/
Comment
-
Well, there are app. 6 billion humans in the world, and only about 1000 tigers, so I tend to disagree with you there. Especially in this case, with the human in question being exceptionally stupid.Originally posted by Rogan Josh
I think trying to feed a tiger in a zoo was really stupid, but once it had the guy's arm they were right to kill it. A man's life is more valuable than a tiger's (even if he is a stupid ****).
AsmodeanIm not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the mark
Comment
-
Would you die to save a tiger?Originally posted by Asmodean
Well, there are app. 6 billion humans in the world, and only about 1000 tigers, so I tend to disagree with you there. Especially in this case, with the human in question being exceptionally stupid.
AsmodeanWhich side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rogan Josh
When again, there is the easier question: would we let Asmodean die to save a tiger?
I think he needs to take one for the team and sacrifice himself.
Which side are we on? We're on the side of the demons, Chief. We are evil men in the gardens of paradise, sent by the forces of death to spread devastation and destruction wherever we go. I'm surprised you didn't know that. --Saul Tigh
Comment
-
Ha! So you support the killing of stupid people!Originally posted by Asmodean
Well, there are app. 6 billion humans in the world, and only about 1000 tigers, so I tend to disagree with you there. Especially in this case, with the human in question being exceptionally stupid.
Asmodean
Blah
Comment
Comment