Originally posted by Worthingtons
If , for some reason i had a gene which made me homosexual, it's be a big deal since it would threaten the prolonged existance of my species - Evolution would surely have stamped it out.
If , for some reason i had a gene which made me homosexual, it's be a big deal since it would threaten the prolonged existance of my species - Evolution would surely have stamped it out.
2. Homosexuality could be a recessive trait, thus being passed down even in non-homosexuals (like hair color, eye color, etc).
3. Even if there is no genetic component to homosexuality, that doesn't mean there isn't a biological component, such as hormones.
4. Evolution is not a conscious entity, it doesn't "stamp out" anything. I don't think you know how it works.
5. Even if it did work this way, evolution takes a long time to operate, longer than recorded human history.
6. Homosexuals like myself are both amused and offended by non-homosexuals asserting to know what we feel and how we think. If we tell you we had no choice in the matter, not believing us is insulting. Thinking you know better than we do why we are what we are is insulting, and it's patent bull****.
There are several theories that homosexuality is not the biological disadvantage you seem to think. It may be a natural method of population control during times of scarcity. One study showed that in post-war Germany, there was a remarkable upsurge in the number of gays, and it could be attributable to stress on the mother during pregnancy triggering some sort of hormonal release that is a natural method of stemming population control, sense in a natural setting, such stress would most likely be scarcity. It isn't conclusive, but it isn't too far-fetched, either.
Finally, consider that every mammalian species has been observed to have members exhibit homosexual behavior. This indicates there are some natural factors at work.
Comment