'Poly D&D- Coordination Thread.

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Jon Miller
no

have them all be GMs, we could use them

it also seems like 3rd it is

so all the GMs need to decide together is the setting

Jon Miller

I could be a GM

Anyway, why not have 2 or 3 separate campaigns? Or is that too much?

[Urban Ranger]

Originally posted by Barley
Can someone post a link to the original thread, I must be daft cus I cant find it.

Don't worry, just use this one.

[Jon Miller]

Originally posted by Urban Ranger


I could be a GM

Anyway, why not have 2 or 3 separate campaigns? Or is that too much?

I was thinking several (maybe one for each GM)

yah

Jon Miller

[Makeo]

Well i'm enthused about this and have started thinking about character creation. Not sure if its legit since I haven't played before.

However I'm going to play a chaotic neutral human rogue. With Samarui tendencies. I was talking to atawa and he said something about there being a yakuza type of character but I don't know about that.

[Sandman]

I know nothing about AD&D, but I'd like to play. I played the last one, and it was quite entertaining.

[MattH]

Ming replies!

After much thought... Please keep your D&D game in the OTF for now. And also, limit yourself to ONLY TWO active threads at any given time. Let me know if you need old ones closed.

I will monitor how the game is going, and if justified, we will find a more permant place for it if warrented.

Thanks for your understanding... and even asking in the first place

Maybe the GM's can get together and start planning...

[Wraith]

I just started reading this thread, but there's something I've just got to respond to.

--"I know practically nothing about Greyhawk as an example"

If you choose Greyhawk, I have the best campaign module I've ever seen, which is set in Greyhawk. It's titled Castle Greyhawk, and it is the most amusing adventure I've ever seen that wasn't homebrew.

Wraith
I have developed "Power Word Nuke". Send me all your gold

[Jon Miller]

we could have two parties (besides snowfires) to start with

Jon Miller

[Solver]

Jon and others, you have gotten a bit too far for understanding of near-virgins such as myself and virgins such as some others. Can anyone get it a bit slower ?

[MattH]

Solver: we're considering playing dungeons and dragons in the same "world", but in different groups of people led by different Dungeon (or Game) Masters. The Game Masters (see voting thread) have to get together and co-ordinate their games so the worlds match up.
(did I read that question right, or did I answer something totally random?)

[Solver]

MattH, thanks, that pretty much explains what I was confused about.

I understood that this idea arised because of the high number of people interested, but what's the exact drawback of having one group under one GM?

[Jon Miller]

having one group under one GM is the usual...
Jon Miller

[MattH]

I was thinking one group for ease of use... The 20+ players aren't all going to be making all the decisions... some will leave, be offline, etc... Jon proposed different groups... it could work

[Jon Miller]

since we only have two threads I would suggest three groups

one for Snowfire (done by email mostly)

two with some combination of Japher/Lonestar/Victor Galis/bookwyrm

[Proteus_MST]

Interesting, if I had time I might be interested.

I own the First Edition of both the Players and the Gamemasters Handbook (the german Version)