Provocative as in, thought-provoking & controversial, not as in softcore porn.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Laid back Australia
Collapse
X
-
For the life of me I cannot see how 15/16 year olds are being 'exploited' here.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
First of all, since showing actual people under 17 (or 18 more likely) having sex ius a crime, if the actors were undergae, the director and othewrs would have been prosecuted already. So I am sre the actors were NOT underage. But the point is that the film borad refuse to give it a rating: why not give it it's harshest rating (whatever they give films with sexually explicit things, for I am sure such films are shown legally in Australia) and get on with it? instead they refuse to give it a rating, thus making showing it a crime. That is the problem.
The simple thing would be to give it Australia's equivalent of X or NC-17 and be done with it, instead of this.If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
So you were taking videos of yourself back then having sex and showing it around .“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
-
So you are about 60 now? (there were home movie cameras beforte video cameras)If you don't like reality, change it! me
"Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
"it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
"Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw
Comment
-
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
What, you are that old?
I just find it odd that people fret about sixteen year olds having sex. I mean it's stupid not to as you have the best stamina at that age.
On a serious note, when I was sixteen my town had the world's highest rate of teen pregnancy. My girlfriend at the time said it was because there was nothing else to do.
(No teen pregnancies caused by your humble narrator; he always covered his stump before he humped).Only feebs vote.
Comment
-
I think the main gripe the censors had with this film was an actual depiction of a guy performing Autoerotic Asphyxiation. Not simulated or acted, but the real thing. If it was the underage sex thing, films like Lolita would have been banned.
Either way, I couldn't give a fudge about this matter. The incestous plight of suburban Californian teenagers is not my idea of art.
Bkeela.Voluntary Human Extinction Movement http://www.vhemt.org/
Comment
-
Originally posted by Agathon
Trust me, we have to destroy Australia before it is too late." ... and the following morning I should see the Boks wallop the Wallabies again?" - Havak
"The only thing worse than being quoted in someone's sig is not being quoted in someone's sig." - finbar, with apologies to Oscar Wilde.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GePap
First of all, since showing actual people under 17 (or 18 more likely) having sex ius a crime, if the actors were undergae, the director and othewrs would have been prosecuted already.
The simple thing would be to give it Australia's equivalent of X or NC-17 and be done with it, instead of this.
I for one, say that Violence in all forms should be reduced and restricted and nudity made more relaxed and laid back... australia used to have a 80/20 relaxation about nudity, these days with the american cencored movies we get more violence and less nudity, and so our society goes more violent less nudity...
just my 3 centsEFR RPG GAME Designer, E.F.R. Forums The Coyn: Fantasy Mod for Civ3:Conquests
Comment
-
I for one, say that Violence in all forms should be reduced and restricted and nudity made more relaxed and laid back... australia used to have a 80/20 relaxation about nudity, these days with the american cencored movies we get more violence and less nudity, and so our society goes more violent less nudity...
American censorship priorities are all wrong and Australia is increasingly adopting them.
We are way too lax on violence and still too tight on sex. IMHO, we over-react to bad language, which is ugly but harmless."I'm so happy I could go and drive a car crash!"
"What do you mean do I rape strippers too? Is that an insult?"
- Pekka
Comment
-
The film was publicly screened, not because of the proponents' disputing the film being banned, but because they believe that they should be able to watch whatever they want.
That would be all well and good if they didn't simply oppose censorship whenever it suits them If someone wanted to show a film that depicted something that was politically incorrect, they would be up in arms!
Either you agree with censorship at some level, or you don't agree with it ever. That idiot from Britain that denies the holocaust is censored at every opportunity, and rightly so. If you agree with that, then the government has the right to appoint censors to deem what is appropriate or not. They should have disputed its censorship instead of making a public statement in the form that they did.
Comment
Comment