Originally posted by GePap
The history? They took over a piece of land, had a kingdom on it. every so often an empire would roll along, conquer them, then after a few centuries they set up some new variation, while the big boys were in flux. Finally, they pissed of the biggest of them all so much, that power decided :enough of this, lets end it, and they did. Yet all that time, the people believed that land was eternally theirs (even if their God seemed to have a rather tense relatiuon with them).
Wow, what an uplifiting history.
The history? They took over a piece of land, had a kingdom on it. every so often an empire would roll along, conquer them, then after a few centuries they set up some new variation, while the big boys were in flux. Finally, they pissed of the biggest of them all so much, that power decided :enough of this, lets end it, and they did. Yet all that time, the people believed that land was eternally theirs (even if their God seemed to have a rather tense relatiuon with them).
Wow, what an uplifiting history.
when modern conditions enabled them so see beyond fatalism and act to change the world, they fully revived their language, and settled the land.
I could go on, but i wont.
Thank you though for your charecterization of Jewish history. Now i think it is much more clear where you are coming from. Not from a stand on international law, but from your view of the Jews and their history.
Comment